washingtonpost.com
Probe Sought Of O'Malley Affair Rumors
Assembly Democrats Doubt Ehrlich Aide Worked Alone

By Matthew Mosk and Allison Klein
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, February 10, 2005; Page A01

Maryland's legislative leaders said yesterday that they do not believe that a longtime aide to Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. (R) worked alone to circulate rumors about the personal life of Baltimore Mayor Martin O'Malley, and they called for an independent investigation.

Sen. Brian E. Frosh (D-Montgomery) said he will ask top lawmakers to grant him subpoena power to conduct hearings into what he called "the Watergate-style dirty tricks" used to smear O'Malley, a Democrat who is laying the groundwork to run for governor in 2006.

"I really think people ought to be hauled in here, put under oath and asked to explain what went on," Frosh said.

Fallout from reports about the alleged smear campaign came on a day when O'Malley and his wife spoke emotionally about the toll that rumors of an extramarital affair have taken on their family, including their 7-year-old son William. Catherine O'Malley told reporters that when she signed William's report card, "he was insisting Daddy sign it, too. He said if Daddy doesn't sign it, too, people will think we're in a divorce."

The mayor pressed Ehrlich to apologize for what he considers an orchestrated campaign. But Ehrlich refused, stressing that he had dismissed aide Joseph Steffen, who sent e-mails discussing the rumor. The governor also rejected calls by Democratic lawmakers for an independent investigation, saying he could handle it himself.

"We'll get to the bottom of this, believe me," he said.

Among Democrats, there was a sense of relief that O'Malley had publicly addressed the rumors that have clouded his potential candidacy for 18 months, and there was a desire to make this a memorable chapter in Ehrlich's first term.

Democratic leaders said they were appalled to learn of efforts, as described in Steffen's e-mails, to circulate a story that the mayor had fathered a child with a Baltimore television reporter and separated from his wife.

In the private correspondence, which was provided to The Washington Post, Steffen wrote: "A lot of the reason that everyone knows [O'Malley's] history is because of what has gone on beneath the surface. . . . A few folks put in a lot of effort to ensure the [Martin O'Malley] story got some real float."

The governor has denied any knowledge of a campaign to spread the rumors, and he asked his chief counsel, Jervis S. Finney, to determine whether Steffen was part of a conspiracy. Several Democratic state lawmakers said they would not be satisfied with an investigation led by Ehrlich's lawyer.

"Anybody [in the governor's office] who says they didn't know about it is full of it," said Del. Robert A. Zirkin (D-Baltimore County).

Maryland Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr. (D-Calvert) said he expects the governor to take immediate steps to prevent the destruction of documents or computer files that might help in understanding Steffen's role in three state jobs he has held since Ehrlich took office in 2003.

"An injunction should be filed today to prevent the administration from destroying e-mails and interoffice memos related to this cowardly conspiracy," he said. "I don't know how many people were involved in this, but I'm certain it was more than just Mr. Steffen."

Ehrlich told reporters that he would preserve and make public those records. He said he believes that Steffen was acting on his own when he sent the e-mails and posted messages spreading gossip about the mayor on a conservative Web site, www.freerepublic.com.

House Republicans said they would resist efforts by lawmakers to launch hearings into the matter. "I don't think we need anything to investigate anything," said House Minority Leader George C. Edwards (R-Garrett). "The governor found out. He fired the person immediately. He's not involved in any grand scheme . . . to discredit the mayor of Baltimore."

Steffen did not take calls or answer the door of his Baltimore apartment yesterday, but someone using his "handle" signed on to the freerepublic.com Web site to give his version of events.

"I didn't start any rumor, I was commenting on rumors that were out there," NCPAC wrote Tuesday night. "Given the volatility of the situation -- and knowing the blowback potential on the Governor -- I opted out rather than letting him bleed further at the hands of O'Malley."

In another posting, NCPAC said that by "inadvertently opening up the Governor as a target," he had made "a mistake, one for which I am willing to take full blame and consequence."

The mayor and his wife spoke to reporters yesterday morning after emerging from Baltimore City Hall tightly clutching each other's hand.

"It is difficult to express the kind of anger a father feels in not being able to protect his children from the lies," Martin O'Malley said. "It's hard to defend against this without giving aid to the people trying to push this."

Catherine O'Malley -- a Baltimore judge and daughter of Maryland Attorney General J. Joseph Curran Jr. (D) -- appeared to hold back tears as she said, "I want to thank the press for not buying into the stories and falsehoods perpetrated against me, Martin and my children."

Democrats said the mayor's ability to address the rumors will remove a significant obstacle that had bogged down his efforts to launch a campaign for governor. "It helps solve a major problem for the O'Malley team, and it's going to generate a huge sympathy vote for him," Miller said.

They also said they believe that the episode will chip away at the reputation of a governor who has been popular with voters.

"This has a huge negative impact on the governor because people will finally realize he's bringing radical right-wing campaign tactics to Maryland," said Terry Lierman, the state Democratic Party chairman. "He no longer has deniable culpability. He has to accept that he will be known by the company he keeps."

Ehrlich said he believes that the controversy will prove to be a momentary distraction. "It is just an unfortunate incident that you have to take care of and then you go on," he said.

Staff writers Hamil R. Harris, David Snyder and John Wagner contributed to this report.

© 2005 The Washington Post Company