President Bush this week will seek sharp cuts in highway projects,
congressional environmental initiatives, job training and scores of other
domestic programs, reflecting the trade-offs required by a fiscal 2003 budget
that calls for record increases for the military and domestic security.
For weeks, Bush and members of his Cabinet have touted the president's
spending initiatives on terrorism and the economic recovery, including a near
doubling of spending on homeland security and a 13 percent boost in defense
that would mirror the expansive Reagan-era military buildup.
_____Related Budget Stories_____
Grudgingly, House Accepts $284 Billion Bill (The Washington Post, Mar 11, 2005)
GOP Lawmakers Present Tax-Cutting Budgets (The Washington Post, Mar 10, 2005)
Tax, Spending Cuts Packaged (The Washington Post, Mar 9, 2005)
Bush's '06 Budget Would Scrap or Reduce 154 Programs (The Washington Post, Feb 22, 2005)
Full Coverage
|
| |
|
Yet the administration has been less forthcoming about how it plans to do
that. With war expenditures, the economic downturn and a major tax cut
consuming the budget surplus, Bush has little choice but to cut or freeze
spending in many parts of the government and to dip into Social Security and
Medicare funds that previously were off limits, according to administration
officials, congressional aides and special interest groups.
These reallocations of taxpayer dollars amount to a gradual but significant
reshaping of the federal government's priorities by the Bush administration,
details of which will be laid out on Monday when the president formally
unveils his spending plan for the coming year.
Bush makes the case for his approach in a statement that will accompany his
budget plan: "By curtailing unsuccessful programs and moderating the growth
of spending in the rest of the government, we can well afford to fight
terrorism, take action to restore economic growth and offer substantial
increases in spending for improved performance at low-income schools, key
environmental programs, health care and science and technology research, and
many other areas."
Bush's budget will include an unusually sharp $9 billion cut in highway
programs, due to the unexpected consequences of a budget formula that was
designed to guarantee that the highway trust fund would be fully spent on
highways and transit, officials said. This budget mechanism, called the
Revenue Aligned Budget Authority formula, works well in an expanding economy
but results in an unusually large cut when the economy turns down. The
biggest loser is California, which is likely to lose nearly a quarter of the
$2.5 billion in federal aid it is receiving this year, according to the
Transportation Department.
For the second consecutive year, the Army Corps of Engineers will take a
serious hit in Bush's budget, according to sources, as the administration
will propose a 10 percent to 15 percent reduction, a freeze on new projects
and renewed efforts to get the corps to focus on its mission of undertaking
flood control, navigation and environmental projects. Last year, Congress
thwarted efforts by the White House to cut the agency's spending by 14
percent.
The U.S. Conference of Mayors wrote the White House and Labor Secretary
Elaine L. Chao last week protesting a proposal to eviscerate spending for a
youth job training program, from $225 million this year to $45 million next
year. The program passed Congress with overwhelming bipartisan support under
the Clinton administration in 1998.
The grants go to 36 cities, including the District. Gregg Irish, director of
the D.C. Department of Employment Services, said half of the District's
five-year, $32 million program could be cut, even though teen unemployment in
2000 was 33.1 percent. "We need this. We need to build this system to deal
with out-of-school youth," he said.
White House budget office spokesman Trent Duffy said yesterday that the
training program proved far less effective in helping young people get jobs
than the Job Corps.
Budget documents and analysts who have studied them say the administration
is considering cutting an additional $620 million in grants to the states for
training and education, including $350 million to youth programs other than
the Job Corps, for which Bush announced he would ask for a $73 million
increase.
The president will seek an overall reduction in EPA spending from this
year's $7.9 billion to $7.6 billion, but an agency official said the aim is
to eliminate a number of pork barrel projects that were added by Congress
over the administration's objections. The administration will also seek a
freeze on hiring to fill vacancies in the enforcement division while shifting
$10 million to the states for increased enforcement activities.
The administration tried to eliminate 270 enforcement positions last year,
but that proposal was blocked by the Senate.
The budget Bush will release on Monday seeks $2.13 trillion in overall
spending in the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1 for defense, domestic programs,
foreign aid and interest on the national debt. After several years of
surpluses, the new budget projects that overall spending will exceed revenue
by about $80 billion.
Administration officials have said that government spending other than for
Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid is expected to grow by 9 percent next
year, compared with the 4 percent growth this year. But when the big amounts
for defense, homeland security and economic stimulus are set aside, the
growth figure drops to 2 percent, barely keeping pace with the rate of
inflation. Democrats, however, say their calculations show that spending
would drop below this year's level.
The White House last year said that its budget would not touch Social
Security payroll taxes to fund other parts of the government and was designed
to pay down $2 trillion of the federal debt by 2010. But recent
administration and congressional projections suggest that Social Security
funds will be tapped for other programs through the rest of the decade, with
little prospect for significant debt reduction.
"I think everybody understands our top obligation is to defend the nation,"
said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.). "In effect, what
the administration is doing is taking Medicare and Social Security funds and
using them for tax cuts and additional spending. The question for the country
is whether that's a wise direction for America. I think it is unwise."
The budget plan would save about $9 billion from changes in Medicaid
accounting procedures, according to an administration official. It also
proposes raising money by leasing mineral drilling rights in Alaska's Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge, an initiative that Congress blocked last year.
In the weeks leading up to the budget's release, the White House and federal
agencies have selectively announced increases for numerous federal programs
that Bush has decided to recommend in his spending plan. In an administration
that is highly disciplined in its release of information, these budgetary
announcements represent a strategic effort to generate good news about areas
of the budget that are important to constituencies whose support will be
crucial to Republicans in the fall elections.
The administration has announced expansions of programs that are significant
to Latinos and other minority groups, to the elderly, and to the social
conservatives who are at the core of Bush's political base.
Last month, for instance, the administration announced that the budget would
propose $2.1 billion in spending over the next decade so that poor immigrants
who have lived legally in the United States for at least five years could,
once again, become eligible for food stamps. On the Martin Luther King Jr.
holiday, the White House announced a $12 million increase for programs
intended to strengthen historically black colleges.
Early last week, the administration said it wants to spend $190 billion in
the coming decade - less than Congress proposed last year - to modernize
Medicare, the health insurance program for the elderly.
About $77 billion of those funds would be used to help older Americans with
low incomes afford drugs by subsidizing states that already offer their own
prescription drug programs to older residents.
Later in the week, Bush's top health aides announced measures intended to
improve younger people's access to health care, including $89 billion worth
of tax credits over 10 years to help working people buy insurance if they
cannot get it through their jobs. And, in a move that pleased social
conservatives, administration officials said they want to let states keep the
$3.2 billion that they have not spent under a children's health insurance
program for the working poor
and to make developing fetuses eligible for
prenatal care under that program.
Bush appears ready to spend more money on Interior Department programs, to
begin to make good on a campaign pledge to halt the deterioration of national
park roads and facilities while launching programs favored by conservatives
to encourage private stewardship of the land.
The budget will call for $1.58 billion for the general operation of national
parks, a $107.5 million increase over current spending. The Interior
Department budget will include $663 million to be used for eliminating a
backlog of park maintenance and road improvement projects. However, that
funding represents a minuscule increase over this year's level, and
environmentalists warn that the administration is falling behind in its
commitment to wipe out the $4.9 billion backlog.
At the Education Department, officials expect a modest overall budget
increase, but nothing comparable to the $6.7 billion boost in spending in
2002 that raised the agency's budget to $48.9 billion.
"I'm completely pleased with that," said Education Secretary Roderick R.
Paige. He said that in the next fiscal year the agency will focus on
improving early childhood education, implementing the education reform law
enacted last year and beginning the arduous process of revamping the nation's
special education laws, which some critics say lead to
a disproportionate designation of minority students and invite litigation.
Staff writers Michael Fletcher, Amy Goldstein, Don Phillips and Spencer Hsu
contributed to this report.