The Washington Post

Why are we talking about the debt ceiling again? And what is the debt ceiling anyway?

Republican National Convention attendees stand in front of the U.S. National Debt Clock, in Tampa, in August. (AFP photo/Robyn Beck)

Look up! It’s the debt ceiling – and it’s getting closer once again.

The debt ceiling is the federal government’s legal borrowing limit as set by Congress. As the government nears the debt limit, lawmakers must vote to increase borrowing levels. Otherwise, the federal government would not be able to pay its bills and the United States could default on its obligations.

The ceiling has been raised nearly 100 times since it was established in the early 20th century and has rarely provoked the kind of sharp debate now roiling Washington politics.

As part of his proposal to avert the year-end “fiscal cliff” of automatic tax hikes and spending cuts, President Obama has called on Congress to give him the power to unilaterally increase the debt ceiling unless two-thirds of lawmakers disapprove. That approach was first proposed by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) as a temporary measure last year but he never intended that it become permanent.

The White House argues that the change is needed in order to avoid future political fights over the debt ceiling that could once again risk a national default as occurred last year. But many lawmakers are opposed to Obama’s proposal, saying it would deprive Congress of its authority over federal borrowing.

The federal government is expected to reach the current $16.395 trillion debt ceiling in February, according to most analysts. The Bipartisan Policy Center estimates that the limit could have to rise by between $730 billion and $1.25 trillion in 2013 and by between $1.3 trillion and $2.2 trillion in 2014.

By the way, why do we have so much debt? Remember that the debt soared during George W. Bush’s administration because of tax cuts and the cost of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It has grown again under Obama by more than $4 trillion, because of decreased tax revenue and higher social spending because of the recession as well as the 2009 economic stimulus program.

Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Follow Ed O’Keefe on Twitter: @edatpost

Read previous Edsplainers:

What’s the difference between raising tax rates and raising tax revenue?

What is the Simpson-Bowles Commission?

What is sequestration?

Q&A: All you need to know about the ‘fiscal cliff’

Ed O’Keefe is covering the 2016 presidential campaign, with a focus on Jeb Bush and other Republican candidates. He's covered presidential and congressional politics since 2008. Off the trail, he's covered Capitol Hill, federal agencies and the federal workforce, and spent a brief time covering the war in Iraq.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
How to make Sean Brock's 'Heritage' cornbread
New limbs for Pakistani soldiers
The signature dish of Charleston, S.C.
Play Videos
Why seasonal allergies make you miserable
John Lewis, 'Marv the Barb' and the politics of barber shops
What you need to know about filming the police
Play Videos
The Post taste tests Pizza Hut's new hot dog pizza
5 tips for using your thermostat
Michael Bolton's cinematic serenade to Detroit
Play Videos
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
The signature drink of New Orleans
Next Story
Ed O'Keefe · December 7, 2012