An election consequence in Virginia

January 31, 2012

The aim of these bills is to open up contracts to bids from both union and non-union firms. In a press release, Obenshain stated that union-only contracts significantly increased construction costs on several recent projects. But there’s a local jobs angle, too:

Since 95 percent of contractors in Virginia are not unionized, moreover, such requirements make it disproportionately likely that out-of-state contractors will be hired for this and other contract work bound by PLAs. “PLAs don’t just inflate costs – they give the work we’re paying for to out-of-state union companies,” said Obenshain.

Speaking of his tie-breaking vote on the Senate Bill, Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling said:

Public dollars should not be diverted to projects involving Project Labor Agreements that favor union shops over merit shops. This critical legislation protects our right-to-work law and continues to promote a pro-business environment.

Chalk it up as another example of how elections really do have consequences — in this case, of the good kind.

Norman Leahy blogs at Bearing Drift. The Local Blog Network is a group of bloggers from around the D.C. region who have agreed to make regular contributions to All Opinions Are Local.

Comments
Show Comments
Most Read

opinions

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters