Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Submit
Next
Review your answers and share

Join a Discussion

There are no discussions scheduled today.

Weekly schedule, past shows

All Opinions Are Local
Posted at 04:00 PM ET, 04/16/2012

Critics look down on the idea of a taller D.C.


Last week’s news that congressional and city officials were even broaching the idea of loosening D.C.’s limits on building heights sent young urbanists into an excited tizzy and old traditionalists into doomsday mode.

The latter group seemed particularly galled by the idea, bemoaning Manhattan-style building canyons blocking out the sunlight (“The height limit gives the city a much more open, inviting and as other commenters have noted, sunny feeling,” wrote Ann Loikow on the Cleveland Park listserv yesterday) and developers cunningly backing the proposal as a means to make more money. In an editorial, the InTowner brought up the dreaded R-word as a means to frighten would-be supporters of loosening up the longstanding height restrictions:

Isn’t it horrible enough that the vista west from the Capitol along the Mall has been despoiled by the hideousness of Rosslyn across the river? And, by the way, can anyone claim that those building are architecturally more distinguished than what we have here in the District? We think not.
This is our nation’s capital and considered one of the most beautiful cities in the world; let’s not destroy that for the sake of the almighty dollar!

[Continue reading Martin Austermuhle’s post at DCist.com.]

Martin Austermuhle blogs at DCist . The Local Blog Network is a group of bloggers from around the D.C. region who have agreed to make regular contributions to All Opinions Are Local.

By  |  04:00 PM ET, 04/16/2012

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company