Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Submit
Next
Review your answers and share
All Opinions Are Local
Posted at 12:18 PM ET, 12/12/2011

The spurious talking points against property rights


Over the last few weeks, I’ve pulled together articles on the property rights amendment that will be debated a second time in the upcoming General Assembly session and the local government opposition to the measure. In each case, the reporters’ articles (all from Northern Virginia) I link to quote local officials as being deeply worried over the section of the amendment that would allow property owners to recoup damages for lost access and profits from takings. All of them use the same example: city or county sponsored street fairs and festivals and new infrastructure projects could unleash a storm of litigation.

Now we have the street festival/sewer line bogeyman appearing in Lynchburg, as duly recorded in this News & Advance piece. What reporter Alicia Petska does that her NoVa counterparts don’t, though, is make note of this universal concern:

Lynchburg and other local governments are anxious about the amendment, saying it’s too broad and will jack up the cost of infrastructure projects and public events such as street fairs and parades.

So we know the talking points have been distributed, read and parroted. But among the more nefarious of the talking points is the one repeated by Lynchburg city manager Kimball Payne:

[Continue reading Norman Leahy’s post at Bearing Drift.]

Norman Leahy blogs at Bearing Drift. The Local Blog Network is a group of bloggers from around the D.C. region who have agreed to make regular contributions to All Opinions Are Local.

By Norman Leahy  |  12:18 PM ET, 12/12/2011

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company