Most Read: Opinions

direct signup
All Opinions Are Local
Posted at 10:19 AM ET, 11/18/2011

What D.C. deserves gets in the way of what it can get

On Wednesday, Mayor Vince Gray, D.C. Council Chairman Kwame Brown and D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton turned down an offer from Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) for increased budget autonomy, an issue that has long been a demand of elected officials and D.C. voting rights activists alike. According to a joint statement released by the trio, an attached condition that the District agree to stop spending any of its money on funding abortions for low-income women was too much to bear, even if increased control over city finances was on the table.

This certainly isn’t the first time that a step forward in the District’s longstanding fight for voting rights, self-determination and statehood has been accompanied by a somewhat noxious compromise. It was only a few years ago, after all, that Norton could have become a full voting member of the House had the city agreed to give up control over its gun laws.

According to the Associated Press, the District’s fight for what it deserves is frustrating those that think it should just settle for what it can get:

Former Rep. Tom Davis, a moderate Republican and an advocate for district self-rule, said the rejection of Issa’s bill was reminiscent of the 2009 effort to give the district a voting representative in Congress, which fizzled after conservative senators added an amendment that would have struck down the district’s tough gun control laws.
In both cases, Davis said, district leaders were “letting the perfect be the enemy of the good.”
“They need to learn to take some victories. I think the budget autonomy is critical. The reality is, with this Congress, that’s the best they’re going to do,” said Davis, who occasionally advises Gray on how to deal with Congress. “I understand the difficulty — I get it. But leadership is not always having perfect choices.”

This conflict between idealists and pragmatists certainly isn’t new. For idealists, nothing short of statehood will work. They’re not necessarily wrong — the principles upon which this country was founded have been violated in the District for over two centuries, and only that 51st star could adequately remedy them. The pragmatists, on the other hand, point out what they claim is obvious — statehood won’t happen, so District residents should be content with even baby steps forward or a larger compromise, like retrocession to Maryland or an exemption from federal taxes, Puerto Rico-style. (In the early 1990s, the D.C. Council passed legislation asking Congress to spare residents federal taxes until full representation could be achieved.)

[Continue reading Martin Austermuhle’s post at]

Martin Austermuhle blogs at DCist . The Local Blog Network is a group of bloggers from around the D.C. region who have agreed to make regular contributions to All Opinions Are Local.

By  |  10:19 AM ET, 11/18/2011

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company