wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost2

Most Read: Local

Posted at 02:30 PM ET, 10/15/2012

Hurricane Hazel: A look back at the 1954 disaster 58 years later


Hurricane Hazel on the morning of October 15th, 1954 as it crossed the Carolina Coastline. (National Weather Service)
Usually, this blog tends to focus on historical weather events in their major anniversary years, e.g., 25th, 40th, 50th, etc. But Hurricane Hazel (October 5-18, 1954) was a storm of such epic proportions on the East Coast - and in the D.C. area - that really any year is worth a look back at its fury in one way or another.

Hazel’s official 98 mph wind gust at 5:05 p.m. on Oct. 15, 1954 at National Airport, is still the highest ever recorded for Washington, D.C. Sustained winds were recorded at 78 mph (Category 1).

The storm was the fourth major hurricane of the 1954 hurricane season. It formed on October 5th near the island of Granada in the southern Caribbean, left more than a thousand dead (mostly in Haiti) and caused over $3 billion (in 2012 dollars) in damages from the Caribbean to Canada. Hazel was originally expected to take on a more northeasterly track and stay offshore, but instead raced northward at speeds up to 60 mph. It spanned the distance from the Carolina coastline to Ontario in just 12 hours.

At the time, the Raleigh, N.C., weather office stated that as a result of Hazel, “all traces of civilization on the immediate waterfront between the state line and Cape Fear were practically annihilated.”

Upon reaching the vicinity of New York State, a weakening Hazel interacted with a potent cold front approaching from the west and was suddenly transformed into a ferocious, extratropical, mid-latitude storm. This, on the same day (October 15th) that it had wreaked havoc in the Carolinas, Virginia, D.C and Pennsylvania as a major hurricane.

Borrowing a term from the crippling 1991 New England Halloween tempest, Hurricane Hazel seemed to be the “perfect storm” of 1954, as it became “extratropical”under somewhat similar circumstances, although not at sea. (See Steve Tracton’s 2008 Capital Weather Gang post on the differences between tropical storms/hurricanes and extratropical storms.)

Taking note of Hazel’s “rebirth,” Environment Canada chose to make an official distinction between the storm’s two phases: they would call it Hazel I until the early evening of October 15th and Hazel II from late evening on. Hazel II would result in tremendous flooding and devastation in the Toronto area, where 81 died. Despite all of the historic blizzards, floods, ice storms and tornado outbreaks, Hurricane Hazel is still remembered in Canada as their “storm of the century.” See book of the same name, by Jim Gifford.

By way of comparison, 16 years earlier there was another devastating East Coast hurricane which was also badly forecast and resulted in a great loss of life and extensive property damage. Known as the “Long Island Express of 1938,” that storm, as was the case with Hazel, was expected to pass out to sea because “hurricanes didn’t hit New England.” (A young meteorological clerk in the Boston Weather Bureau, who believed and told his superiors that a strong ridge to the north would force the storm inland, was overridden.)

The rest is history. That storm caused over 300 fatalities almost $5 billion* in damages in New England and is considered by many meteorologists to be one of the top 10 weather events of the 20th century.

Related: Washington’s worst five hurricanes and tropical storms

By  |  02:30 PM ET, 10/15/2012

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company