Richmond earthquake “not likely” an aftershock from 2011 Virginia quake

296Earthquake22

The 3.2 magnitude earthquake that rattled Richmond and surrounding areas of the Mid-Atlantic last night (at 9:47 p.m.) was likely its own, new earthquake – not an aftershock of the much more powerful 5.8-magnitude earthquake that struck August 23, 2011 and damaged the Washington Monument.

Last night’s quake, its epicenter 32 miles west of Richmond or 8 miles southwest of Powhatan, lies in a different area of the central Virginia seismic zone from the 2011 quake, whose epicenter was in Mineral, Va.

“This is pretty far south of that plate [from the 2011 quake] – about 60 kilometers [37 miles] south: not likely an after shock,” said Paul Caruso, a geophysicist at the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Earthquake Information Center in Denver.

The USGS has received over 1,600 reports from witnesses who felt last night’s quake, but no damage has been reported.  Typically, it takes an earthquake of magnitude 5 or higher to cause damage.  Magnitude 3 earthquakes are associated with “weak” shaking.

While a minor quake, Capital Weather Gang readers felt shaking as far away as Arlington, Annapolis, and Potomac.  South of the epicenter, shaking was felt as far southwest as Lynchburg, according to USGS.


Areas where last night’s earthquake was felt. (USGS)

 

By comparison, the 2011 quake was felt “from central Georgia to central Maine and west to Detroit, Michigan and Chicago, Illinois,” writes USGS.

In addition to its much greater range, the 2011 quake was thousands of times more powerful than last night’s relatively minor tremor.

“Every time you go up 1 magnitude, there’s a 100 times more energy released,” said USGS’ Caruso.  “If you go from from 3.2 to 5.2, it’s 10,000 times the energy released.”

Sometimes when an earthquake strikes, it is a foreshock, portending a bigger tremor to come.

But Caruso doesn’t think there’s much to worry about. “We can’t predict the future, so no one can say,” he said. “But there’s very little likelihood of something bigger occurring.”

“Even if it was a foreshock, we wouldn’t expect anything significant [to follow], magnitude 6 or larger, say,” Caruso added.

 

Jason is currently the Washington Post’s weather editor. A native Washingtonian, Jason has been a weather enthusiast since age 10.
Comments
Show Comments
Most Read Local

Heat Tracker

45
90-degree days year-to-date
Yearly Average
36
Record Most
67 (1980,2010)
Record Fewest
7 (1886,1905)
Last Year
24

At a Glance

Sun.

partlycloudyday
71° /91°

Mon.

partlycloudyday
74° /89°

Tue.

partlycloudyday
74° /94°

Wed.

thunderstorms
75° /93°
Drop 20%

Thu.

thunderstorms
75° /93°
Drop 30%

Fri.

thunderstorms
74° /91°
Drop 30%
National Airport
Dulles
BWI

Right Now

D.C. Area Almanac

 
National
Dulles
BWI
Avg. High
 
Avg. Low
 
Rec. High
 
Rec. Low
 
Sunrise
 
Sunset
°F
 
 
°C
Next Story
David Streit · May 22, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.