wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost2

Most Read: Local

Class Struggle
In-depth coverage: Education Page |  The Answer Sheet
Posted at 04:56 PM ET, 10/16/2011

Don’t you dare not read this community college piece

The U.S. community college course placement system is a mess. That includes the many well-regarded two-year colleges in the Washington area.

You want to stop reading now, don’t you. My page view totals and e-mail traffic indicate readers move on quickly—who’s Valerie Strauss going after today?—whenever they see the words “community college.”

In the Internet age, we writers must respect your choices. For many people, Harvard is a more intriguing subject than Howard Community College. But keep in mind that nearly half of all U.S. undergraduates are at this moment attending community colleges. The fact that millions of those students are having trouble getting the courses they want is worthy of attention.

A few weeks ago I told the story of Monica Dekany, a California mom who, because she failed a community college placement test, was forced to take remedial classes for courses in which she had already earned credit elsewhere and, as officials eventually conceded, didn’t need. Susan Headden revealed this in a Washington Monthly expose of the sorry state of remedial (the schools prefer “developmental”) education.

Could Dekany have wasted thousands of dollars in the same way at Washington area community colleges?

It depends. At Montgomery College, Anne Arundel Community College and Howard Community College her previous credits would have spared her the placement test. At 75,000-student Northern Virginia Community College, the second-largest two-year school in the United States, the English department would say okay, but not the math department.

“Many students forget their mathematics skills if not used for a period of time and the tests identify if that is the case,” said George Gabriel, NOVA’s vice president for institutional research, planning and assessment.

All of the local two-year colleges I surveyed were aware that new research is forcing them to justify remediation. Half to two thirds of their incoming students must pay for no-credit catch-up courses before they are allowed to take credit courses in those subjects.

This requirement for remediation is contradicted by a study of thousands of community college students. Those who found ways to take for-credit courses despite flunking placement tests passed the courses 71 percent of the time. Headden said that was very close to the 77 percent passing rate for all students in those courses.

Administrators at local community colleges said they do not think the Dekany debacle could happen on their campuses. Their academic advisers and professors can waive remedial work when other data, such as professors’ own tests, contradict the results of standardized placement exams. They know of no students forced to pay for courses they didn’t need, although one instructor at NOVA acknowledged that “with the number of students we serve, just about anything can happen.”

Nearly all campuses here are trying to prepare students better for placement tests and make remedial courses more effective and less time-consuming. They are giving practice placement tests to high school students. They are creating shorter remedial courses that cover only those skills the new students lack. Prince George’s Community College has a 100-station computer lab to help.

Most local college administrators don’t think they could eliminate remedial courses in favor of extra tutoring and other after-class assistance, as Austin Peay University did, because most of the Tennessee state school’s students, unlike theirs, are full-time. But they are trying that approach with some remedial students.

Jonathan Gueverra, the chief executive officer of the University of the District of Columbia Community College, wants more than that. “I have made the eradication of developmental education my top priority,” he told me. “The data are clear and based on my experience working at other institutions, I have learned we need to do things very differently.”

Remedial instructors said they are being unfairly criticized despite their hard work helping students who are far behind. “No one but us knows the students, but who is listening to us?” said a teacher at NOVA.

That is a good question. Remedial educators need to be involved with the changes. With so much in flux, students must also ask many questions about their options as they start community college. These institutions, I am learning, are much more complex and important than most people think.

By  |  04:56 PM ET, 10/16/2011

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company