Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Submit
Next
Review your answers and share

Join a Discussion

Weekly schedule, past shows

ComPost
About Petri |  Get Updates: On Twitter ComPost on Twitter |  On Facebook Petri on Facebook |  RSS RSS
Posted at 08:00 AM ET, 11/09/2011

Joe Paterno, Penn State and the bystander effect


What he shouldn’t have done was nothing. (AP Photo)
This isn’t funny. I wish it were.

I don’t know college football. It’s that thing that is on TV in the background as I smear Durkees on my Christmas leftovers. But I’ve heard of Joe Paterno. He’s the professor on the sidelines, the Penn State legend dedicated to creating a team of student-athletes.

And now everyone has heard what happened at Penn State.

The behavior of former Penn State football defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky as described in the grand jury report [do we need more detail?] is nothing short of despicable. That Sandusky was allegedly allowed to continue preying on young boys for more than a decade is utterly sickening.

And now the indignant response begins. “I would have said something,” everyone says. “I wouldn’t have gone to my supervisor. I would have gone straight to the police.”

It is easy to say. It is harder to do. And if you don’t believe, consider who didn’t do it: Joe Paterno.

He’s not a bad man, as Deadspin writer Drew Magary points out. Even after this cloud engulfs him, possibly ending his career, it will be hard to call him a bad man.

But the bystander effect is a terrible thing. Look around you and notice that everyone is doing nothing, and you can conclude that nothing is the thing to do. It happens far more often than we’d like.

While the murder of Jayna Murray took place at the Bethesda Lululemon, Apple employees next door reported hearing screams for help and the sounds of thumping and dragging. They did what everyone else was doing. Nothing.

Thousands of us watched, stunned, the video of the Chinese toddler Xiao Yueyue being struck by a white van and then left bleeding in the street, where she was hit by a large truck as 18 people passed by. And they didn’t even have a program to protect. But we wouldn’t have been like that. We would have done something. Well, would we?

And now, at Penn State, Joe Paterno says he did what he was supposed to do.

Some might say that he did what everyone around him was doing: nothing. No, others point out, Paterno reported the situation to his supervisor. Fair. That is what everyone else did. And then?

It is harder to do the right thing than it is to do the same thing as everyone else.

The number of people at Penn State who reported horrible things and then washed their hands of the affair is unsurprisingly substantial. Building Penn State’s program was the work of decades, and to be forced to crack open its brilliant facade and let dark, ugly things crawl out was a prospect from which everyone shrank. With a legacy like that at stake, no one wanted to be the one making the ultimate call. And the ones who did make the call got it wrong. Sandusky kept his access to the football program. They asked him to avoid showering with children. No one went to the police.

Technically speaking, Joe Paterno didn’t act wrongly.

Or, put another way, he didn’t act, wrongly.

That is the whole trouble.

What would you have done if you had been in Joe Paterno’s place? Are you sure? Rabbi Brad Hirschfield discussed the ethics of the Penn State scandal in a video chat Wednesday. You can watch it by clicking this link.

By  |  08:00 AM ET, 11/09/2011

Tags:  Penn State, ugh, not funny

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company