wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost

The Post Most: Sports

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/tv-listings-dc
On Twitter: dcsportsbog and SarahKogod  |  The Bog on Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS
Posted at 12:55 PM ET, 09/05/2012

Cal Ripken and Michael Wilbon on Strasburg


(John McDonnell - THE WASHINGTON POST)
I think we’ve pretty well established that the community of retired tough-guy baseball players does not understand the Stephen Strasburg Shutdown Strategy.

But Cal Ripken has always seemed particularly non-meathead-ish, to me, and I’d imagine to a lot of baseball fans. He’s funny, and witty, and measured, and would probably never use his media perch to tell an injured young star to suck it up.

Even in delivering this opinion about Strasburg on SiriusXM’s MLB Network Radio, Ripken touched on both sides of the debate, and remained measured and rational. But he also made it clear that, like many other retired ballplayers, he would have been loathe to go along with such a plan.

“It’s perplexing because the competitor in all of us will say, ‘Wait a minute now,’” Ripken began. “You know, I understand the rationale for this, and I understand the future, and I understand what they’re doing. And I think they’ve put themselves in a position where they’re not going to turn back from it. [Mike] Rizzo’s not going to change his mind....

“If I was Stephen Strasburg, it’s not a foregone conclusion you’re going to get back to this position in another year,” Ripken continued. “I won the World Series in 1983 with the Baltimore Orioles, and I thought that would just be one of many opportunities. And we never got back all the way through.

“In some ways, you want to live in the moment, but I can certainly understand their caution,” Ripken concluded. “But I don’t think they’re going to turn back. We might hear from Strasburg a little bit. If it was me, if I was Stephen Strasburg, I’d be making a lot of noise, saying, ‘I’m pitching.’”

Maybe so. By the way, if you want someone who is less measured, here was Michael Wilbon during a PTI discussion of Strasburg this week.

“I’m not about to criticize the Nationals,” Wilbon said. “Every major judgment they’ve made the past couple years has worked out in their favor. Wise decisions. But how about pitching him every seventh day or every eighth day or doing something to keep hope alive for him individually? You could have done that.....

“Tony, they’re not gonna beat the Cardinals in a series without Strasburg at the top of that rotation,” Wilbon later said. “They’re not. They’re not pretty good, they’re damn good, but when you take an ace out of the rotation? I’m not gonna rip their decision making, but they’re in a tough place now, aren’t they?”

You’ll recall that the Nats just took 3 of 4 games from the Cardinals. Strasburg did not actually start all three of the wins. That means the team somehow stumbled its way to more wins than losses without Strasburg on the mound. But whatever.

Related

Strasburg Shutdown Contest winners

Post Editorial Board endorses Strasburg Shutdown

Stan Kasten and Jim Riggleman are in favor

Bill James says it’s a ‘reasonable’ approach

Rudy Giuliani opposes the shutdown

Troy Aikman and Terry Bradshaw weigh in

Mitch McConnell supports the plan

Robin Ficker protests the strategy

James Andrews says you can’t criticize the Nats

Mitch Williams calls the strategy “absolutely absurd”

Dennis Eckersley says the Nats have to pitch Strasburg

Rick Sutcliffe has a plan for Strasburg

Stephen A. Smith says it’s disgraceful

Kevin Millar asks the Nats to look Strasburg in the eyes

Jake Peavy says it blows his mind

Scott Boras on possible legal ramifications

Rob Dibble blasts Strasburg and Rizzo

Andrea Mitchell discusses Strasburg on MSNBC

By  |  12:55 PM ET, 09/05/2012

Categories:  Nats | Tags:  Stephen Strasburg, Cal Ripken, Mike Rizzo, Michael Wilbon

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company