Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Review your answers and share
Erik Wemple
On Twitter E-mail |  On Twitter Follow |  On Facebook Fan |  RSS RSS Feed
Posted at 09:45 AM ET, 01/23/2012

ABC’s Gingrich story: A late hit?

Howard Kurtz, host of CNN’s Reliable Sources, probes ABC’s Brian Ross on just about every aspect of the network’s high-profile “open marriage” interview last week with Marianne Gingrich. The host comes out swinging: “To air this story a day and a half before the South Carolina primary feels like a late hit.”

Ross responds that the network didn’t want to air the thing within 24 hours of the primary, prompting Kurtz to jump in: “Twenty-four hours would have been too close but 36 or 48 hours is okay?” To that, Ross said that you’ve got to give the other side a full news cycle to rebut stuff.

Later in the chat, Kurtz grabs another talking point: news value. “In watching the Nightline story, I felt that most of what Marianne Gingrich had to say — and she’d never done it in a television setting — she has said in the past, to print reporters, for example, from Esquire, Washington Post. So what in your view made that newsworthy since the allegations . . . were not new, but what was new was that you had video?”

Send in the Can’t-Have-It-Both-Ways SWAT Force. Kurtz can’t with a straight face advance these contradictory points. If, in his judgment, there’s nothing new in the ABC report, then it cannot be a “late hit.” And if it’s really a “late hit,” then it has to pack some news punch. Choose, Kurtz!

By  |  09:45 AM ET, 01/23/2012

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company