Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Submit
Next
Review your answers and share

Join a Discussion

Weekly schedule, past shows

Erik Wemple
On Twitter E-mail |  On Twitter Follow |  On Facebook Fan |  RSS RSS Feed
Posted at 12:48 PM ET, 03/12/2012

CNN’s O’Brien goes for a do-over

Last week, CNN’s Soledad O’Brien attacked Joel Pollak of Breitbart.com for misinterpreting “critical race theory,” that body of thought now in the news thanks to the un-news of a hug between Barack Obama and then-Harvard Law Professor Derrick Bell two decades ago. Pollak then asked O’Brien to defend her own interpretation of Bell’s defining academic work. That led to something of a fail on part of the CNN host, who mouthed a helping of boilerplate:

Critical race theory looks into the intersection of race and politics and the law and as a legal academic who would study this and write about it, [Bell] would advance the theory about what exactly happened when the law was examined in terms of racial politics.

Based on that definition, Pollak returned the favor, charging O’Brien with misinterpreting the theory.

O’Brien apparently felt the sting, because this morning she revisited the topic with Dorothy Brown, a law professor at Emory University. Over a seven-minute segment, O’Brien and Brown agreed that Pollak and Breitbart.com had it wrong in every possible way. As a CNN viewer, I’ll gladly take the initial, contentious segment over O’Brien’s chorus-of-consensus do-over.

By  |  12:48 PM ET, 03/12/2012

Tags:  soledad o'brien, cnn, dorothy brown, joel pollak

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company