Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Submit
Next
Review your answers and share

Join a Discussion

Weekly schedule, past shows

Erik Wemple
On Twitter E-mail |  On Twitter Follow |  On Facebook Fan |  RSS RSS Feed
Posted at 04:20 PM ET, 01/12/2012

Daily Caller issues sweater-vest correction


Middle-aged man in sweater vest. (Reuters) (RICK WILKING - REUTERS)
Remember all the heat that the Daily Caller took last year for failing to issue a correction on its story that the Environmental Protection Agency was lobbying for 230,000 additional employees? Well, let it not be said that the right-leaning news site is averse to setting the record straight.

Yesterday, the Caller published this story on the paucity of sweater vests among attendees at Rick Santorum’s New Hampshire primary party; the garment is a staple of the former senator’s campaign-trail appearances.

Reporter Alexis Levinson surveyed the event and came up with a number of sweater-vest-related observations, including this one:

Only one sweater vest was not a solid color: an argyle specimen sported by a middle-aged supporter.

The site later appended an asterisk to “middle-aged,” complete with a corresponding footnote to the piece, saying: “*The wearer of the argyle sweater is far more youthful — both in appearance and actual age — than the original language of the article implied.”

Merriam-Webster puts middle age at between roughly 45 and 64 years of age, though there are many other definitions out there. Whatever the range, any seasoned journo can imagine how those italics came about: Hey, I was the guy in that argyle sweater vest, and I’m 29 years old, or something along those lines.

Caller editorial boss Tucker Carlson pretty much confirms the scenario: “Apparently one of the sweater-vest-wearing bystanders at the Santorum rally e-mailed to complain that he’s really not so old, so in the interest of accuracy we corrected it.”

By  |  04:20 PM ET, 01/12/2012

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company