Journalist working for the government: No problem?

UPDATE: Just received this statement from a Thomson Reuters spokesperson:

“Sudam’s work as a Reuters stringer over the course of many years has been fair and accurate. When he became a translator for the president, he disclosed his role to Reuters. On reviewing the matter, however, we believe it’s not appropriate to use a stringer who is also working for the government. He is no longer reporting for us from Yemen.”

Original post:

If you can have a debate about this issue, well, you can have a debate about anything.

Reuters, as it turns out, has had a correspondent in Yemen who works for the Yemeni president as a translator. From the New York Times:

The reporter, Mohamed Sudam, continued to work closely with the president even as he filed regular bylined reports for the news agency on the increasingly violent uprising against [President Ali Abdullah] Saleh’s three decades of authoritarian rule.

The story in the Times, of course, quotes someone raving about this outrageous conflict of interest — an easy quote to get, considering how true it is. There’s a Twitter hashtag out there — #ShameonReuters — slamming the wire service over Sudam’s dual role.

What’s remarkable, though, is that others are defending the setup: “Many people, they think he is close to the president, but actually he is just a staff member and they need him as a translator. He’s not one of their stooges,” the Times quotes a Yemeni expert.

Another expert insists that the arrangement doesn’t qualify as an ”inherent” conflict of interest. Cash, money, a paycheck — that constitutes the most “inherent” conflict of interest of all.

Erik Wemple writes the Erik Wemple blog, where he reports and opines on media organizations of all sorts.

opinions

Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Comments
Show Comments
Most Read

opinions

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters