Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Submit
Next
Review your answers and share
Erik Wemple
On Twitter E-mail |  On Twitter Follow |  On Facebook Fan |  RSS RSS Feed
Posted at 10:47 AM ET, 11/09/2012

Message to conservatives: Cut the whining


(Charles Dharapak - AP)

Among the “self-searching questions” that Matt Labash of the Weekly Standard recommends for conservatives following President Obama’s victory:

Should our pundits be allowed to predict elections? I don’t pretend to be nearly as smart on the subject of electoral politics as Karl Rove, Charles Krauthammer, Joe Scarborough, Peggy Noonan, George Will, and a host of others. And yet some two-and-a-half months ago at the height of Paul Ryan mania, I did one thing in this very space that none of them managed to do. I correctly predicted that Obama would win. And I did it using this old-school method that few on the right seemed to favor this cycle: I read the swing-state polls, and believed them! My advice to the winger punditocracy: stop practicing how to whine about perceived liberal media/pollster bias. Start practicing how to count.

Whatever the wisdom of Labash’s counsel, its implementation could create a gigantic editorial problem. Absent liberal-media kvetching, how to fill all that air time, how to fill all those column inches?

By  |  10:47 AM ET, 11/09/2012

Tags:  matt labash liberal media, liberal media whining, matt labash pollster bias, labash media bias, labash liberal media, daily caller liberal media, labash daily caller bias

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company