Murdoch flatters Huffington Post


Oh ... I think everybody’s doing it for money, including the bloggers. They’re trying to sell advertising, they’re trying to get a bigger audience. You get a thing like the Huffington Post, which started as pretty much a political pamphlet with advertising and broadened itself quite cleverly, but mainly just stealing stories from existing newspapers. They now have a few reporters, and blogs from individual people, but it’s a very big thing here, they have a British edition as well as an American edition. And I don’t believe that they’re making a profit yet, but they’re read by many millions of people.

So where’s the belittlement here? Let’s break down Murdoch’s endorsement of the Huffington Post:

1) Statement: “started as pretty much a political pamphlet with advertising and broadened itself quite cleverly.”

Verdict: Unmitigated compliment.

2) Statement: “mainly just stealing stories from existing newspapers.”

Verdict: Neutral. Granted that this sounds a bit derisive. But consider Murdoch’s DOB: March 11, 1931. He became a newspaper executive in the 1950s, back before he’d even been called a “moth-eaten kangaroo,” let alone grappled with the worlds of linking and aggregation.

3) Statement: “They now have a few reporters...”

Verdict: That assessment technically understates the number of reporters at the Huffington Post, which has in excess of 40 such people. Which is, to a guy like Murdoch, “a few,” max. Try the News Corp. Annual Report: The guy presides over 51,000 employees. It’s all relative with a mogul like him.

Ruling: No belittlement whatsoever.

Erik Wemple writes the Erik Wemple blog, where he reports and opines on media organizations of all sorts.
Show Comments
Most Read


Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters