Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Submit
Next
Review your answers and share

Join a Discussion

There are no discussions scheduled today.

Weekly schedule, past shows

Erik Wemple
On Twitter E-mail |  On Twitter Follow |  On Facebook Fan |  RSS RSS Feed
Posted at 06:19 PM ET, 05/08/2012

New York Times journos: Not the fiercest union advocates

The video above answsers the pressing question of whether newspaper veterans can serve as fierce union advocates: They could use some training.

There’s too much evenhandedness and high-mindedness to get really riled up about the position of the New York Times Co. in the ongoing negotiations with the Newspaper Guild of New York. In the two minute-plus presentation, Times national correspondent Amy Harmon says “it’s frustrating” that the negotiations “haven’t gone anywhere.” Reporter Kevin Sack laments that the Times could bleed talent to competitors willing to pay great salaries. Reporter Dan Barry gets a touch more direct: “I like having my pension, and I’d like to keep it.”

In a brief chat, Barry acknowledges: “We’re probably better journalists than union advocates.” Harmon on the same topic: “We want to uphold the quality of the paper. Everyone I know feels that way — that’s what we’re fighting for. I don’t think that makes us bad activists.”

No matter, really: The slide near the end of the video, about former CEO Janet Robinson’s exit package, provides a militant finishing agent.

By  |  06:19 PM ET, 05/08/2012

Tags:  dan barry, amy harmon, new york times, guild, negotiations, new york times, Newspaper guild of New york

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company