Most Read: Opinions

Join a Discussion

There are no discussions scheduled today.

Weekly schedule, past shows

Erik Wemple
On Twitter E-mail |  On Twitter Follow |  On Facebook Fan |  RSS RSS Feed
Posted at 04:46 PM ET, 02/17/2012

Should the White House stay mum on Shadid?

Anthony Shadid’s death prompted a White House statement and some needless argument on Twitter. (AP Photo/Steven Senne, File) (Steven Senne - AP)
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney today said the following in regards to Anthony Shadid, the New York Times foreign correspondent who died yesterday on assignment in Syria. From ABC’s Jake Tapper:

“All of us, from the President on down, are greatly saddened by the news that Anthony Shadid had died while reporting in Syria,” Carney said. “Anthony Shadid was one of the best, perhaps the finest, foreign correspondent working today, in my opinion — for what it’s worth. And it’s a tragic loss to journalism, to The New York Times, most importantly to his family. And our thoughts and prayers, the President’s thoughts and prayers are with his wife and children.”

All true. But proper? That’s where Reuters media critic Jack Shafer jumped into the fray on Twitter:

The White House shld shut up. MT @jaketapper White House Heralds Work of NYT’s Shadid “A Tragic Loss to Journalism”

Strong stuff right there — strong enough to bring on a Friday afternoon Twitterama:

When great Americans pass away, the White House often issues a statement lamenting the event and commending their contributions. Celebrities, entrepreneurs, politicians — the tributes cross all kinds of professional boundaries. There’s no good reason to deplore the practice as it applies to fallen journalists. They’re Americans too.

By  |  04:46 PM ET, 02/17/2012

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company