An early ACO convert

at 04:48 PM ET, 10/20/2011


(Spencer Platt - GETTY IMAGES)
The Accountable Care Organization rule has only been out for a few hours now, but it’s already getting a much more positive reception than the draft regulation issued a few months ago. As I wrote earlier today, the program is an important one; if it works, it could move Medicare away from a costly fee-for-service payment system to one that pays out flat fees for all treatment related to a given patient or condition.

Today’s regulation does a lot to both increase the financial incentives and decreases the risks, of participating in the program. The American Medical Association likes it, as does the American Hospital Association.

But the most important endorsement so far comes from the American Medical Group Association, which represents more than 400 large provider organizations--the exact kind that the Obama administration hopes will participate in the program.

AMGA was among the most vocal critics of the administration’s first shot at an ACO rule, back in April. In a letter to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the group blasted the early rule as  “overly prescriptive, operationally burdensome, and the incentives are too difficult to achieve to make this voluntary program attractive.”

Now, they’re whistling a different tune. My colleague N.C. Aizenman spoke with George Roman, AMGA’s senior director for health policy, and found out they’re pretty happy with the new rule.

“At first blush I’m surprised at the flexibility and responsiveness that CMS has shown,” he told her. “The changes from the proposed rule to the current version seem to be significant and that’s a very good thing. ... CMS has listened to what other people said and proposed a different approach. ... They clearly heeded what people said and it’s a big step in the right direction.”

Roman says it used to be an office joke that maybe 20 or so provider groups would sign up to participate in the ACO program (HHS estimates as many as 270 will). But he and his colleagues probably won’t be joking much anymore.

“If my first blush impressions are followed through ... then some interest will be generated that was severely dampened by the onerous [original] proposed framework,” says Roman. "I’m hoping lots of ACOs form because of the potential this model has for transforming our health system for the better.”

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges

    The Post Most: BusinessMost-viewed stories, videos and galleries int he past two hours

    Blog Contributors

    Ezra Klein

    Ezra Klein

    Ezra Klein is the editor of Wonkblog and a columnist at the Washington Post, as well as a contributor to MSNBC and Bloomberg. His work focuses on domestic and economic policymaking, as well as the political system that’s constantly screwing it up. He really likes graphs, and is on Twitter, Google+ and Facebook. E-mail him here.

    Suzy Khimm

    Suzy Khimm

    Suzy Khimm covers the budget, economic policy, and financial regulatory reform. Before coming to Washington, she was based in Brazil and Southeast Asia, where she wrote for the Economist, Slate, and the Wall Street Journal Asia. Follow her on Twitter here, and email her here.

    Sarah Kliff

    Sarah Kliff

    Sarah Kliff covers health policy, focusing on Medicare, Medicaid and the health reform law. She tries to fit in some reproductive health and education policy coverage, too, alongside an occasional hockey reference. Her work has appeared in Newsweek, Politico, and the BBC. She is on Twitter and Facebook.

    Brad Plumer

    Brad Plumer

    Brad Plumer is a reporter focusing on energy and environmental issues. He was previously an associate editor at The New Republic. Follow him on Twitter. Email him here.

    Yahoo launches Axis browser

    Our digital devolvement

    The high cost of savings

    Section:/blogs/ezra-klein