Why are the markets down today? No reason.
Why are stocks diving today? Oh, no reason in particular. Or maybe every reason in particular. Which is pretty much the same thing.
Every major paper in the country is leading with the Dow’s fall. But not one has a good explanation for why the trap door opened today as opposed to, say, last Tuesday or next Wednesday. Here at the Washington Post, Neil Irwin, Michael Birnbaum and Sarah Halzack attribute it to the Federal Reserve saying they see “significant downside risks” to the economy and European banks appearing troubled. The New York Times gives events the same spin. So does the Wall Street Journal.

(Jin Lee - Bloomberg)
But is there anyone anywhere who doubted that the moment was suffused with significant downside risk? Or that European banks were troubled? If the market hadn’t priced that in, then that’s a whole new reason to lose faith in the markets.
Nor is it clear that the Fed story even makes sense. As Reuters’ Felix Salmon notes, a gloomy Fed forecast is “normally a good sign for markets, since it implies that monetary policy will remain looser for longer.”
Bloomberg also blames the Fed, but they suggest that market is worried that “central banks are running out of tools to prevent a recession,” not that a gloomy outlook unnerved investors. But based on what evidence? The Federal Reserve didn’t declare its impotence yesterday. As this morning’s note from Goldman Sachs argued, “the easing action was more aggressive than our expectations or the market’s.” Nor is there any reason to think that the Federal Reserve is any less empowered to combat another recession than they were last week.
Which is not to say that the bad news begins and ends with central banks. There was some bad manufacturing data from the eurozone, and FedEx’s earnings were low, and there are some concerns about Chinese growth. But given the grim state of the world economy, none of that news is unusually bad. If you left every data point unchanged but the market hadn’t dived, you wouldn’t be seeing stories tomorrow wondering about the Dow’s unusual resilience.
Salmon’s headline is that “there’s no reason why stocks are down today,” and perhaps that’s right. Or perhaps it’s exactly wrong, and stocks are down today not because any one thing is so bad, but because everything is so bad, and when everyone is scared, sometimes people begin running without quite knowing why. Either way, there’s no really good reason that stocks are down today as opposed to some other day. The squiggly line squiggled down. That’s all there is to it.
The Post Most: BusinessMost-viewed stories, videos and galleries int he past two hours
Blog Contributors
Ezra Klein

Ezra Klein is the editor of Wonkblog and a columnist at the Washington Post, as well as a contributor to MSNBC and Bloomberg. His work focuses on domestic and economic policymaking, as well as the political system that’s constantly screwing it up. He really likes graphs, and is on Twitter, Google+ and Facebook. E-mail him here.
Suzy Khimm

Suzy Khimm covers the budget, economic policy, and financial regulatory reform. Before coming to Washington, she was based in Brazil and Southeast Asia, where she wrote for the Economist, Slate, and the Wall Street Journal Asia. Follow her on Twitter here, and email her here.
Sarah Kliff

Sarah Kliff covers health policy, focusing on Medicare, Medicaid and the health reform law. She tries to fit in some reproductive health and education policy coverage, too, alongside an occasional hockey reference. Her work has appeared in Newsweek, Politico, and the BBC. She is on Twitter and Facebook.
Brad Plumer

Brad Plumer is a reporter focusing on energy and environmental issues. He was previously an associate editor at The New Republic. Follow him on Twitter. Email him here.


























