Most Read: Politics

Federal Eye
Posted at 06:00 AM ET, 05/15/2012

Risk of violence in federal workplace examined

All federal government organizations are potentially at risk for workplace violence, not just those in high-crime areas or dealing with potentially violent members of the public, according to an agency studying the issue.

The Merit Systems Protection Board has released preliminary findings of a study it launched after release of statistics showing that state and local government establishments experienced higher rates of workplace violence than private-sector establishments. MSPB issues reports on various aspects of federal employment, in addition to hearing appeals of disciplinary actions and certain other employment disputes.

MSPB said it undertook the study because the federal government shares many of the factors creating risk for other levels of government, including having locations in high-crime areas, working with violent or unstable persons or guarding valuable goods or properties.

However, it said that its initial findings show that the risk of violence is not limited to organizations with such characteristics. “These groups are certainly at risk, but all federal organizations can be affected by workplace violence since one of the most common perpetrators of violence in the federal workplace are federal employees,” MSPB wrote in its most recent newsletter.

“The seeds that may spark a violent outburst by an employee may be rooted in a conflict with other employees or supervisors, conflict with customers or conflict outside the workplace such as daily economic or personal pressures,” it said.

“Our initial findings also indicate that, although most federal employees believe their agencies take sufficient steps to ensure their safety from violence in the workplace, agencies may need to give more attention to preventing violence perpetrated by employees,” MSPB added.

The most recent major report on violence in the federal workplace was published in 1998 by the Office of Personnel Management. It described warning signs in behaviors such as threats, stalking and intimidation, and advised agencies on security measures, training, dispute resolution and other steps.

By  |  06:00 AM ET, 05/15/2012

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company