The Washington Post

Bill would force federal employees onto insurance exchanges

A new Republican proposal would push federal workers off their employer-sponsored health plan and onto the insurance exchanges being established under the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare.

Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, introduced the bill on Friday, following rumors that Democrats were trying to exempt members of Congress and their staffs from a provision in current law that requires them to enroll in the exchanges in 2014.

Camp’s measure would extend that policy to all federal workers except active duty military and postal workers. Most employees affected by the legislation are enrolled in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.

“If the ObamaCare exchanges are good enough for the hardworking Americans and small businesses the law claims to help, then they should be good enough for the president, vice president, Congress and federal employees,” said Camp spokeswoman Sarah Swinehart.

The Affordable Care Act establishes insurance exchanges for people whose employers do not provide coverage.

The requirement for members of Congress and their staffs to enroll in exchanges came about as lawmakers were debating the health care overhaul four years ago. Republicans at the time insisted that members of Congress, the president and their staffs should have to take part in the exchanges.

Democrats have denied that they had any plan to exempt lawmakers and their staffs from the requirement.

Lawmakers in recent weeks have questioned whether the exchange provision prohibits the government from paying a portion of premiums as it does now for members of Congress and their staffs. They’re concerned that some workers could not afford the full cost of coverage on their own.

Lawmakers have also questioned whether congressional staffers would lose the retirement health benefits they qualify for after working for the government for 20 years.

The Office of Personnel Management, which oversees the federal health benefits program, has not indicated when it will issue an interpretation of the law as it relates to those issues.

For more federal news, visit The Federal Eye, The Fed Page and Post Politics.

To connect with Josh Hicks, follow his Twitter feed, subscribe to his Facebook page or e-mail

E-mail with news tips and other suggestions.

Josh Hicks covers Maryland politics and government. He previously anchored the Post’s Federal Eye blog, focusing on federal accountability and workforce issues.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Sleep advice you won't find in baby books
In defense of dads
Scenes from Brazil's Carajás Railway
Play Videos
For good coffee, sniff, slurp and spit
How to keep your child safe in the water
How your online data can get hijacked
Play Videos
How to avoid harmful chemicals in school supplies
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
How much can one woman eat?
Play Videos
What you need to know about Legionnaires' disease
How to get organized for back to school
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
Next Story
Josh Hicks · April 30, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.