The Washington Post

Report: Security clearances need regular review

Federal agency officials understand the need to limit the number of security clearances they issue, but without regular reviews they can’t be sure they are doing that, according to a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report.

(Alex Wong/Getty Images) (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

The title of the document, scheduled for release at a Senate hearing Wednesday, summarizes GAO’s recommendation: “Actions Needed to Help Ensure Correct Designations of National Security Positions.”

There were 4.9 million federal employees and contractors eligible to hold security clearances in 2012.  Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) and Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the ranking members the Senate and House homeland security committees respectively, have attributed problems with security clearances to the large number of positions that are classified.

“Today, there are nearly 5 million individuals with a security clearance.  Five million,” said Sen.  Jon Tester (D-Mont.), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs subcommittee on the federal workforce. “And there are no indications that number will decrease any time soon. But it only takes one individual to slip through the cracks.”

The report said while a regulation proposed by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Office of Personnel Management “requires agencies to conduct a one-time reassessment of position designation within 24 months of the final rule’s effective date, it does not require a periodic reassessment of positions’ need for access to classified information.”

Because reviews are not done consistently, GAO said, “executive branch agencies cannot have assurances that they are keeping the number of positions that require security clearances to a minimum.”

Tester cited the concerns of employee representatives who worry that the proposed regulation, along with a recent federal appeals court decision, could allow the government to classify many positions as sensitive, which would deprive them of certain employee rights.

Tester and Sen. Rob Portman (Ohio), the top Republican on the subcommittee, have urged the agencies to postpone the regulation “until the matter has been fully and publicly aired, and questions about its true scope, including the estimated costs and number of impacted federal workers, are answered.”

Twitter: @JoeDavidsonWP

Joe Davidson writes the Federal Diary, a column about federal government and workplace issues that celebrated its 80th birthday in November 2012. Davidson previously was an assistant city editor at The Washington Post and a Washington and foreign correspondent with The Wall Street Journal, where he covered federal agencies and political campaigns.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
What can babies teach students?
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
A veteran finds healing on a dog sled
Play Videos
A fighter pilot helmet with 360 degrees of sky
Is fencing the answer to brain health?
Scenes from Brazil's Carajás Railway
Play Videos
How a hacker group came to Washington
The woman behind the Nats’ presidents ‘Star Wars’ makeover
How hackers can control your car from miles away
Play Videos
Philadelphia's real signature sandwich
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
Europe's migrant crisis, explained
Next Story
Lisa Rein · November 19, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.