Groups try to block nuclear regulator’s vote, citing conflict of interest

Dozens of environmental organizations and nuclear-power opponents are trying to stop a federal regulator from participating in votes this month as he prepares for a new leadership role with an international group.

In a letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Thursday, the Sierra Club and 33 other groups called on the panel to postpone its Aug. 26 votes until Commissioner William Magwood leaves to become director of the non-government Nuclear Energy Agency on Aug. 31.


Cattle graze near the Sacramento Municipal Utility District’s Rancho Seco Nuclear Power Plant near Herald, Calif. (AP/Rich Pedroncelli)

“Mr. Magwood has created a real and apparent conflict of interest by pursuing and accepting a position with an international agency whose primary purpose is to promote nuclear power, at the same time he serves on a U.S. agency that is dedicated to protection of public health and safety and the environment,” the letter said.

Magwood wrote a letter to the groups in July challenging the notion that the Nuclear Energy Agency promotes nuclear power. He also said that he plans to participate in the upcoming votes.

“The NEA does not advocate any particular outcome, but, with the support of its member countries, focuses on facilitating policy analyses, sharing information and experience among its members, developing cooperative research projects, and developing consensus positions on technical issues, including those relevant to nuclear safety regulators around the world,” Magwood said.

The commission and Magwood declined to comment for this article.

The Aug. 26 votes concern a proposed rule on long-term nuclear-waste storage and another plan to lift a hold on reactor licensing that the commission approved two years ago.

Magwood told the groups that his participation would have “no impact on the NEA’s financial health or even its future research or policy activities.”

But the opposing groups said a vote by the commissioner would lead to questions about whether he “influenced the agency to gloss over the serious problems that attend the long-term storage and disposal of spent reactor fuel, in order to fulfill his new mission of promoting nuclear energy worldwide.”

The Nuclear Energy Agency is part of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, a group that promotes economic progress and world trade. The agency’s stated mission is to “provide authoritative assessments and to forge common understandings on key issues as input to government decisions on nuclear energy policy.”

Updated Aug. 21, 9:30 p.m.: An earlier version of this article referred to the Nuclear Energy Agency in the first paragraph as an “industry group.” The description of the organization has been changed to “international group.”

Josh Hicks covers Maryland politics and government. He previously anchored the Post’s Federal Eye blog, focusing on federal accountability and workforce issues.

politics

federal-eye

Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Comments
Show Comments
Most Read Politics

politics

federal-eye

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Next Story
Josh Hicks · August 21, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.