Nevada Supreme Court will decide whether strippers owe entertainment taxes


Nevada Supreme Court Chief Justice Kristina Pickering addresses state lawmakers at the Legislative Building in Carson City, Nev. (Cathleen Allison/AP, File)

The Nevada Supreme Court on Wednesday will hear arguments in a lawsuit filed by several Las Vegas strip clubs over an entertainment tax they say violates First Amendment rights of free speech and expression.

The case centers on a 10 percent entertainment tax levied in 2003 by the state legislature. The tax is levied on cover fees, food and drinks sold at the clubs.

The strip clubs have paid the tax for the last decade, under threat of criminal prosecution by state officials, but they say they want refunds because taxing performances by exotic dancers violates those dancers’ First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Previous court cases have held that exotic dancing is protected by the First Amendment. Attorneys for the strip clubs cite a 2001 decision out of the Sixth Circuit, Deja Vu of Nashville Inc. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, in which judges wrote that “entertainers and audience members … are certainly engaged in a ‘collective effort on behalf of shared goals.'”

Lawyers for the strip clubs say [pdf] the taxes are being levied on the exercise of free speech rights; targeted at a small and specific group of speakers; and aimed at the content of that free speech — that is, exotic dancing. All three types of taxes have been ruled unconstitutional in previous Supreme Court decisions.

Nevada’s Department of Taxation disagrees. The tax, the department says in court filings, is an excise tax on business transactions.

The strip clubs originally filed the case in 2006, though they have lost before a Las Vegas federal court, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and a state court in Clark County, Nev. The case before the state Supreme Court on Wednesday will hear arguments over procedural processes available to the eight strip clubs after the Nevada Tax Commission rejected their requests for a refund under the 2003 law.

Reid Wilson covers national politics and Congress for The Washington Post. He is the author of Read In, The Post’s morning tip sheet on politics.

politics

govbeat

Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Comments
Show Comments
Most Read Politics

politics

govbeat

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Next Story
Reid Wilson · January 3, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.