The Washington Post

How Microsoft money is driving Washington’s gun background check debate

(Karen Bleier/AFP/Getty Images)

It looks like you’re trying to add gun controls. Can Microsoft help?

Three former executives — all of them among the world’s richest men — and their spouses have contributed more than $1.1 million to a campaign pushing Washington state to adopt universal background checks for all gun sales. Of the nearly $3.5 million raised by all groups fighting for and against the universal background check ballot measure—Initiative 594—roughly a third of the funds have come from that trio: Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer and Paul Allen, who rank 1st, 26th and 21st, respectively, on the Forbes 400 list of the richest people in America.

Allen, a co-founder who resigned form the company decades ago, contributed the largest amount — $500,000 — last Monday, though Ballmer, who stepped down as CEO this February, and his wife Connie have together donated $580,000 in recent weeks. Bill and Melinda Gates contributed $50,000 last October. All the contributions were given to one group, the Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility, which has raised $3.3 million, according to Secretary of State data. Two groups opposed to the measure have raised less than $90,000.

“I would imagine this will be the one of the most expensive initiative campaigns in the country because of what it symbolically stands for,” University of Washington political science Prof. Matt Barreto told the Associated Press recently.

The measure would apply the background checks already required of sales by licensed dealers to all sales in which either the buyer or seller is in Washington, meaning the checks would be conducted for sales at gun shows, online, and between individuals. The checks would have to be conducted even if a firearm is given as a gift or loan.

Gifts between family members, the transfer of antique firearms, temporary transfers to prevent death or injury, transfers involving members of public agencies including law enforcement, and transfers to licensed gunsmiths who service firearms would all be exempt. A firearms dealer risks losing his or her license for violating the rule.

An April poll found support for the measure at more than 70 percent.

Niraj Chokshi reports for GovBeat, The Post's state and local policy blog.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Sleep advice you won't find in baby books
In defense of dads
Scenes from Brazil's Carajás Railway
Play Videos
For good coffee, sniff, slurp and spit
How to keep your child safe in the water
How your online data can get hijacked
Play Videos
How to avoid harmful chemicals in school supplies
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
How much can one woman eat?
Play Videos
What you need to know about Legionnaires' disease
How to get organized for back to school
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
Next Story
Sarah Ferris · August 18, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.