Moderates are scared to run for Congress


The Olympia Snowes of U.S. state legislatures aren’t hankering to run for Congress. (Carolyn Kaster — Associated Press)

Imagine that you’re a state legislator thinking about running for Congress. The polarization in Congress is pretty apparent to you. Democratic members are increasingly liberals and Republican members are increasingly conservative. But here’s the problem: you don’t fit that pattern. You’re a moderate. What will you do?

According to new research (gated version here) by political scientist Danielle Thomsen, you’re much less likely to run for Congress. Thomsen argues that in an era of polarized parties, how well politicians “fit” their party ideologically will affect whether they decide to run for higher office.  Drawing on a 1998 survey of state legislators, Thomsen finds that moderate Republicans were less likely than conservative Republicans to believe they could win a House primary and less likely to value a seat. There were fewer difference between moderate and liberal Democrats — which Thomsen attributes to the nature of the Democratic Party at that point in time, which featured a larger number of moderate to conservative Democrats serving in the House.  Of course, many of those Democrats are now gone.

Perhaps more telling, however, is not what state legislators say in a survey but whether they actually do run for Congress.  Drawing on data from 2000-2010, Thomsen finds that moderates in both parties are less likely to run than those who “fit” the party better: liberals in the Democratic Party and conservatives in the Republican Party.  Here’s her graph illustrating this finding, with the ideologies of several members of Congress noted for the sake of illustration:


Since most state legislators don’t run for Congress, the average probability of running is fairly low.  But that probability is still much greater among conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats than among moderates in their party.

Thomsen’s finding suggests that polarization has created a sort of vicious cycle. Greater polarization makes moderates hesitant to run. This means that the candidates who do run tend to be more ideologically doctrinaire.  And when those candidates win, polarization is reinforced or even exacerbated.

John Sides is an Associate Professor of Political Science at George Washington University. He specializes in public opinion, voting, and American elections.

politics

monkey-cage

Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Comments
Show Comments
Most Read Politics

politics

monkey-cage

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Next Story
Tobias Gibson · July 3, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.