The Post Most: NationMost-viewed stories, videos and galleries int he past two hours
There are no discussions scheduled today.
Live Q&A, 2:30 p.m. ET
Curiosity crew members and Post reporters will host a Google Hangout with readers.
The real problem with evolution is that Christians have yet to reflect deeply on how they fit into a Darwinian world.
Perry doesn’t appear to know Texas’ official policy on the teaching of evolution in public schools.
If 55 percent of Americans believed the South won Civil War would it be true?
The struggle to keep religion and science separate in the classroom is a never-ending battle in Texas, as is it in other states where anti-evolution sentiment runs deep. But the Constitution has something to say about faith-based education.
Dawkins and his contemporaries are trying to beat religion at what religion does best, conversion.
A politician’s attitude to evolution, however peripheral it might seem, is a surprisingly apposite litmus test of more general inadequacy.
When Rick Perry and the millions of others who resist the concept of evolution, they not only resist science in potentially dangerous ways, they disown a fundamental truth about the faith they follow.
There was no Adam and no Eve. No Adam and Eve: no fall. No fall: no need for redemption.
The concept of evolution is critically dangerous to any literalist, fundamentalist vision of Christianity because it not only contradicts, but bluntly refutes, the accounts of creation in Genesis.
Catholics have never felt tension between their belief in God the creator and evolutionary theory.
One should never overestimate the intelligence in the electorate, but a leader who plays to the fears born in ignorance is not worthy to lead this nation.
The Hindu and Abrahamic conception of time, human origins, and creation, then, are diametrically divergent. Hindus conceive of creation as part of an ongoing cycle of creation and destruction.
Religion at its best should respect and foster science, in its methods and content, because all knowledge and truth derive from the one God.
Only unguided natural selection is truly incompatible with Catholic teachings.
Evolution is inconsistent with religion only if you believe that religion must be based on antiquated, disproven ideas. Faith should not be afraid of science.
An accurate interpretation of “In the beginning God created…” can rightfully include incremental adaptability.
However, science is not and should not become democratic. If 100 million people believe a wrong thing, it is still a wrong thing.
They give keen insight into how we understand ourselves and the wonderful world in which we live. And so does the scientific understanding of that creation; two different understandings of truth, arrived at by different methods.
Religious views of evolution are also evolving.
The biblical and theological case for evolution is a case for God’s infinity and the freedom of God’s creation.
A politician’s attitude to evolution, however peripheral it might seem, is a surprisingly apposite litmus test of more general inadequacy.
No one was there “in the beginning” so I am going to trust what God said.
“Darwinism” is certainly incompatible with Christianity and quite possibly wrong. Nature, matter and energy, are not all there is.
Loading...
Comments