The government shouldn’t pick winners and losers

President Obama and Gov. Mitt Romney have spent lots of time debating tax plans aimed at stimulating the economy. One issue that needs more attention is the impact of the federal government picking winners and losers.


Small businesses can run aground quickly when funding for their clients unexpectedly runs dry. (Chris Clark/AP)

But who gets hurt?

The small businesses that supplied these companies and invested in equipment and inventory to meet the needs of what appeared to be a new opportunity often are the ones left holding the bag. 

I know of a small manufacturer who ramped up production to support the solar industry, adding equipment and expanding his workforce to 150 employees. As soon as the government cut support to his customer, the orders stopped. He is no longer running three shifts, has well under 100 employees and is looking to sell equipment.

 I am the president of an 89-year-old manufacturing firm. The last four years have been the toughest and most uncertain of my 33 years at this firm. So while I feel very fortunate that we are weathering this economic storm, I remain anxious about our future.  I see opportunities to expand our production and distribution, but with an ever-changing tax code and regulatory environment and continual government intervention to pick winners and losers, I sit on the sidelines waiting for greater stability. 

 These government actions are in my opinion the greatest deterrent to small business investment and, by extension, the greatest deterrent to job creation.

Thomas E. Secor is president of Durable Corporation, a manufacturer/master distributor of loading dock bumpers and floor matting based in Norwalk, Ohio.

 

business

on-small-business

Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Comments
Show Comments
Most Read

business

on-small-business

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters