Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Submit
Next
Review your answers and share

Join a Discussion

Weekly schedule, past shows

ThePlumLIneGS whorunsgov plumline
Posted at 02:20 PM ET, 04/05/2011

GOP has again moved goalposts for budget compromise, Dems say

With a government shutdown looming and budget talks apparently at a standstill, Democratic aides are accusing the GOP of moving the goalposts for compromise yet again.

A senior Senate Democratic aide tells me that in today’s private meeting at the White House, Speaker John Boehner signaled to the President and to Harry Reid that Republicans were not willing to support any budget compromise that can’t garner the votes of 218 Republicans in the House. That would be a break from the GOP’s previous posture: Republican leaders had appeared willing to reach a deal that could pass the House with Republican and Democratic support, even if it meant losing some Republicans.

Harry Reid is expected to make an accusation along these lines today when he speaks to the press, the aide tells me, though this could change, depending on fast-shifting circumstances.

“Our takeaway from the meeting was that Republicans will not accept anything that cannot pass the House without 218 Republican votes,” the aide tells me. “That means $73 billion isn’t good enough.”

That last line means that the $33 billion in cuts as a proposed target compromise — on top of $40 billion of cuts that were already agreed upon — will not be sufficient for a compromise, if 218 Republicans cannot support it.

If Reid’s takeaway from the meeting is accurate — the GOP’s readout of the meeting did not indicate this version of events, and a Boehner spokesman didn’t immediately return an email for comment — it would mean that House GOP leaders have decided they are not willing to back a compromise if it means sacrificing significant Republican support on their right flank .

“Rather than finding common ground, they’re more concerned with appeasing the Tea party and extreme right wing than finding common ground with Democrats,” the Dem aide continued.

In a surprise appearance before the White House press corps moments ago, Obama didn’t divulge what happened at the meeting. But he did point out that Republicans appear to be rejecting the current compromise number of $73 billion, even though that is the original number articulated by Boehner, before conservatives began demanding deeper cuts.

“We are now at the figure that was Speaker Boehner’s original proposal,” Obama said. “Speaker Boehner originally called for $73 billion worth of cuts. Members of his caucus insisted on making it $100 billion. What we’ve said is, `We’re willing to go to 73.’”

More when I learn it...

UPDATE: A House GOP aide, asked for comment, did not deny the above account, saying only: “Given that Sen. Reid hasn’t yet managed to pass a long-term CR through the Senate, while Speaker Boehner has passed on in the House, he should probably stick to his own knitting.”

UPDATE II: Harry Reid, speaking to reporters just now, went public with this charge, claiming:

“We thought for several days that we were very close to an agreement, but the meeting at the White House and the negotiations over the weekend really indicated to me and I think most people who are watching this that the leadership in the House is being guided by the tea party. They’re saying they won’t agree to anything unless they get 218 Republican votes. We all know that’s a nonstarter. We couldn’t have passed the last short-term C.R. if that were the case. We have been willing to compromise at $73 billion. Our problem is, we cannot agree to take all that from domestic discretionary spending. This $73 billion was the Republicans’ original proposal. So I guess they were for it before they were against it. But now they’re moving the goal post again.”

By  |  02:20 PM ET, 04/05/2011

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company