Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Review your answers and share
ThePlumLIneGS whorunsgov plumline
Posted at 06:50 PM ET, 08/06/2012

Happy Hour Roundup

* Good David Firestone rant about the larger context behind Mitt Romney’s lie about Ohio early voting and the real reason behind it: Those who vote early are more likely to vote for Obama.

* Politifact adds its voice to those condemning Romney’s Ohio lie.

* Joan Walsh puts Romney’s Ohio falsehood in the key context: Happy 47th birthday, Voting Rights Act!

* Romney suggests Obama is trying to block members of the military from exercising their “fundamental right to vote,” prompting this from Jonathan Chait:

If Romney is conceding that voting is a fundamental right rather than a privilege — not all Republicans concede this anymore — and, more importantly, that practical impediments can interfere with that right, then what justification do they have for their wide-ranging campaign to deny the same convenience to other Americans?

* The second mass shooting in less than a month, with a gun that was purchased legally, is still not enough to get Obama to call for a meaningful policy response to a problem that continues to kill Americans.

* Glenn Kessler skewers the Romney camp’s new ad knocking Obama for not visiting Israel., an attack designed to sow doubts about his values and whom he secretly sides with; the target isn't just Jewish voters.

* Ed Kilgore on why the Romney camp keeps promising a 1980-like late break against Obama: It quiets the right’s tendency to greet bad polls with calls for all-out ideological nuclear war.

* Harry Reid keeps up the assault on Romney: “The whole controversy would end very quickly if he would just release his income tax returns just like everybody else that runs for president.”

* A GOP strategist explains why Reid keeps doing what he’s doing:

“I just believe that this hurts Romney more. If he doesn’t produce his tax returns, this will probably continue. If he finally relents, then Reid just says ‘thank you.’”

* Joe Conason: “The missing evidence is in Romney’s grasp, yet he insists that he will never produce it. Does anyone need instruction from a judge to make the correct inference?”

* Smart point from David Dayen: The battle over Reid’s charges has become a kind of proxy fight for the actual tax policy dispute in the presidential campaign, which is very real.

* And via Taegan Goddard, a remarkable statistic: “the White House race will come down to nine states that have absorbed an eye-popping $350 million in commercials so far.”

One wonders if the massive amounts slated to pour into these states — and the diminishing returns they’ll likely result in — will end up partly negating Romney’s cash advantage.

What else?

By  |  06:50 PM ET, 08/06/2012

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company