wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost2

The Leaderboard

Most Read: National

From the Blogosphere

Jena McGregor

Jena McGregor

Staff writer Jena McGregor teases out the leadership issues in the day’s news.

Tom Fox

Tom Fox

Guest contributor Tom Fox, of the Partnership for Public Service, writes weekly about issues in the federal workplace.

Lillian Cunningham

Lillian Cunningham

Lillian Cunningham is the editor of On Leadership and writes features for the section.

Post Leadership
Posted at 12:24 PM ET, 12/07/2011

FAA chief Randy Babbitt: The second reason he needed to resign


FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt resigned on December 6, 2011 after his arrest for allegedly driving while intoxicated. (Chip Somodevilla - GETTY IMAGES)
If you are the head of the Department of Transportation and one of your pet issues is trying to stop drunken driving, it’s pretty obvious you’re going to expect the resignation of one of your deputies if he gets pulled over for doing just that. And sure enough, that’s exactly what happened after FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt’s weekend arrest for allegedly driving while intoxicated. After first being put on administrative leave, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood on Tuesday evening accepted Babbitt’s resignation from the FAA’s top spot.

As Babbitt’s resignation makes clear, context is king—and as we’ll discuss in a bit, so is coming clean. For instance, say you’re a CEO of a major corporation and one of your star executives (whose job has nothing to do with driving, safety or operating heavy machinery) gets pulled over for having too much eggnog at the holiday party. Would you expect him to resign? On the one hand, choosing to get behind the wheel of a car says a lot about his judgment and decision-making. On the other, if there’s no other sign of a pattern of alcohol dependence, it could be a very human, if very risky, mistake. Many leaders, I’d guess, might suggest substance abuse counseling and admonish a first-time offender for being so careless. But they probably wouldn’t show him the door.

Now let’s consider a different example. Say you oversee several government agencies and the head of one of them has a job that, again, has nothing to do with driving, safety, heavy machinery, children, eggnog or any other category that doesn’t pair well with intoxicated driving. But he is a public figure, and therefore, subject to rules like the one in Fairfax City, where it’s the police department's policy to disclose the arrests of public officials. This one’s a trickier call: The crime doesn’t flagrantly fly in the face of a public safety campaign you’ve been touting, but having one of your deputies pulled over for a DUI is hardly good for your reputation, either.

Now let’s take this one step further: You learn about the arrest through a police press release, rather than the offending deputy coming to tell you himself. That makes your call much clearer. Even if he is a star performer—Babbitt was respected by Congress, and his departure could slow down or hurt the chances of safety measures being worked on by the FAA that the airline industry opposes—his inability to disclose difficult truths once a clearer head prevailed is a major red flag.

My guess is that as much as the context of Babbitt’s job factored into the FAA chief’s departure, the way LaHood found out about it played a big role as well. The transportation secretary apparently didn’t learn the news until more than 36 hours after the reported incident. “What I told Randy is that I was very disappointed with the way that I learned about this,” he said Tuesday.  Babbitt took to the skies for several hours Monday, landing just as the news became public Monday afternoon. If he is convicted, he will lose his pilot’s license.

People make mistakes. They get behind the wheel of the car when they shouldn’t, they drink too much at the holiday party. That’s not to excuse driving under the influence, but humans, even FAA chiefs, do have lapses in judgment. While Babbitt’s alleged decision to drive under the influence made keeping his job untenable, his unwillingness to tell LaHood the hard realities in a time of crisis is an even bigger cause for concern.

More from On Leadership:

Meet the 2011 Top American Leaders

Powerful women in Washington

Mr. Schmidt goes to Washington

Like On Leadership? Follow us on Facebook and Twitter:

@post_lead | @jenamcgregor | @lily_cunningham

By  |  12:24 PM ET, 12/07/2011

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company