wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost

The Leaderboard

The Post Most: National

From the Blogosphere

Jena McGregor

Jena McGregor

Staff writer Jena McGregor teases out the leadership issues in the day’s news.

Tom Fox

Tom Fox

Guest contributor Tom Fox, of the Partnership for Public Service, writes weekly about issues in the federal workplace.

Lillian Cunningham

Lillian Cunningham

Lillian Cunningham is the editor of On Leadership and writes features for the section.

Post Leadership
Posted at 03:17 PM ET, 02/29/2012

Losing Olympia Snowe


Sen. Olympia Snowe announced her decision not to run for re-election this fall. (Carolyn Kaster - AP)
Nearly two decades ago, when Olympia Snowe was still a member of the House of Representatives and Washington was a bit less partisan of a place, a headline from the Boston Globe about the retiring senior senator from Maine blared “In Maine's Rep. Snowe, GOP finds a role model.”

If only the same could be said today. Snowe is, of course, a role model—a long-serving Republican who has held fast to her independent streak and mentored incoming women. She has been a powerful voice for women’s rights, and a powerful vote in Congress, as her middle-of-the-road viewpoint left her courted from both sides.

She was one of just three Republicans to support President Obama’s economic stimulus bill. She is for abortion rights, even if most in her party are staunchly against them. She voted against the 2003 Bush tax cuts and criticized the size of the package, calling it “disconcerting to have the deficit financing long-term tax cuts” at the time. (She did, however, vote for an extension in 2011.) And although she ultimately voted against the president’s health-care bill, her vote was wooed obsessively by Democrats, making her influential in the outcome of the final bill.  

Still, something tells me today’s incoming GOP freshmen don’t aspire to be the same kind of leader. Snowe decided not to run for re-election again because she does not “realistically expect the partisanship of recent years in the Senate to change over the short term.” Sadly, she is right: The parties are becoming further and further apart on issues, and moderates on either side of the aisle, especially the right, are dropping out and becoming more and more rare.

What Snowe’s departure has made me wonder, however, is what good her stepping aside does to improve cooperation and mend the partisan divide in Congress. You can’t blame someone who is 65 and has served more than 30 years in Washington for deciding that it’s time to hang it up, especially amid today’s circus. But if this is something she’d like to change—or at least help to keep from getting worse—it would best be led from within. By all accounts, Snowe would have won re-election, and she said Tuesday that she and her husband are both in good health.

Her departure may be a boon for Democrats, as it leaves open a likely pick-up in the Senate at a time when Republicans are aggressively trying to win a majority. But cheering the news is short-term thinking that does not consider the chilling effect Snowe’s exit will have on future moderate leaders on either side. Without Snowe—or the five other moderates who have decided not to seek re-election this year—few remain to inspire new centrists on either side to step forward. 

More from On Leadership:

PHOTOS | Leadership goes to the movies

Submit a question for our new workplace advice column

Obama and the state of race in America

Like On Leadership? Follow us on Facebook and Twitter:

@post_lead | @jenamcgregor | @lily_cunningham

By  |  03:17 PM ET, 02/29/2012

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company