Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Submit
Next
Review your answers and share

Join a Discussion

There are no discussions scheduled today.

Weekly schedule, past shows

Post Partisan
Posted at 01:18 PM ET, 08/02/2011

Biden’s terrorist insult


It is difficult, at least for me, to remain angry at Vice President Joe Biden, who combines a predisposition toward offensive gaffes with being an obviously decent guy. He currently stands accused of saying the Tea Party “acted like terrorists” during the debt-limit debate. In Biden’s defense, it seems that he was reflecting the intemperate language of others during a meeting with House Democrats. Which also leaves some House Democrats with no defense.

As a rule, it is distasteful and counterproductive to equate one’s political opponents with murderers of the innocent. Claiming that someone has “held the budget hostage” is a metaphor. Calling someone a “terrorist” is an excuse for a fistfight. But Biden’s obvious flaw is foolishness, not viciousness. The first we would forgive a friend; the second is harder to overlook. When Biden later said that Gabrielle Giffords is “now a member of the cracked head club like me,” it was tasteless. But who could accuse Biden of being intentionally cruel toward Giffords? Biden lacks the normal filter of appropriateness. But an unfiltered Biden is not, as far as I can see, an angry or heartless man.

Tossing around a word like “terrorist” slips a little more poison into our political discourse. But so does the taking of exaggerated offense – the political equivalent of flailing in dramatic reaction to a basketball foul. In politics, as in life, the motive of an insult matters.

By  |  01:18 PM ET, 08/02/2011

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company