Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Join a Discussion

There are no discussions scheduled today.

Weekly schedule, past shows

Post Partisan
Posted at 02:57 PM ET, 07/01/2011

Halperin’s comment unclear to some

Call it a cultural thing, but I didn’t have the slightest idea what Mark Halperin, a MSNBC senior political analyst, was getting at when he used a reference to the male anatomy beginning with “d” to refer to President Obama.

Obviously, a lot of people were confused, including White House press secretary Jay Carney, who complained to the cable network about Halperin’s remark. MSNBC evidently agreed, issuing a statement calling the comment “completely inappropriate and unacceptable.” The cable outlet suspended Halperin indefinitely, and in an apologetic statement of his own, Halperin said his suspension was “totally appropriate.”

Still, I was perplexed. While calling someone what Halperin did may not be the term heard in high-level discourse, it simply is not among the words of choice used by folks of my generation and racial persuasion to show disrespect or disdain. The term’s just not in our arsenal of insults.

As obnoxious words go, it isn’t saying much of anything.

In fact, in my neck of the words, and under certain circumstances, one, being called such, might take a bow.

So my gripe with Halperin is not his use of the term (it’s rather lame), but, rather, his deployment of a word that is not universally understood and accepted as offensive and insulting.

That, Mark Halperin, was culturally insensitive.

By  |  02:57 PM ET, 07/01/2011

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company