Is the cost of Obama’s stimulus underestimated?


This message is from Michael Mussa, a former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund who’s now at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Here’s his reasoning. Yes, the cost is $447 billion in 2012. But what happens after 2012? “We get to 2013: Do we raise the payroll tax back up? Do we stop extended unemployment benefits? . . . That does not make any sense,” says Mussa. The economy and jobs aren’t likely to be growing so rapidly to justify ending the full program cold turkey.

It especially doesn’t make any sense, he argues, because it would coincide with other deficit cuts for 2013 mandated by Congress as part of the deal to raise the federal debt ceiling. So the economy would face a double whammy.

To lighten the blow, Mussa says, Obama’s new stimulus would probably be phased out over a number of years, raising its full cost well beyond the one-year figure. The president has said the program would be paid for by additional future deficit reductions, but it’s unclear whether his pledge covers these potential costs.

Mussa made his comments Friday at the Peterson Institute’s semi-annual economic outlook conference.

Robert J. Samuelson writes a weekly column on economics.

opinions

Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Comments
Show Comments
Most Read

opinions

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters