wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost

The Post Most: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Should the United States fund the service program AmeriCorps? President Obama would increase its budget. Rep. Paul Ryan would eliminate federal funding for the program.

Submit
Next
Review your answers and share

Join a Discussion

Weekly schedule, past shows

Post Partisan
Posted at 10:15 AM ET, 05/17/2011

NY 26: Republicans in retreat from Medicare cuts


Well, no one can doubt anymore that Republicans are petrified that the Medicare cuts in Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget might cost them the 26th congressional district in New York, long a safe Republican seat, in the May 24 special election.

It’s a classic technique in politics that if your opponent has found an issue that’s working against you, you turn the tables and declare your opponent’s position to be as bad as yours, or worse.

That’s what Republican Jane Corwin is trying to do with a new ad against Democrat Kathy Hochul, who has made Corwin’s support for the Ryan budget and its Medicare privatization central to the campaign.

No, says the Corwin ad (preposterously), “The truth is it’s Hochul who says she would cut Social Security and Medicare.” This claim is based on a single line from a recent debate in which Hochul said: “Everything should be on the table — entitlements, defense spending but also revenues.” Nothing could be more moderate or reasonable, but suddenly moderation of this sort is turned into a terrible threat.

Watch the ad:

The fact checkers are all over Corwin for her distortion. In a story headlined “Corwin TV ad accused of making bogus claims,” the Buffalo News reported that “upon seeing the ad, an independent fact-checking organization and a leading defender of the programs said: Don’t believe it.”

The News quoted Eugene Kiely, deputy director at FactCheck.org, criticizing the Corwin campaign for interpreting Hochul’s “on the table” comment as an outright assault on programs used largely by senior citizens.

“That’s bogus,” Kiely said. “Just saying everything is on the table does not equate Social Security or Medicare cuts.”

There’s a substantive problem for Republicans here. In budget talks in Washington, they are saying that you can’t be serious about the deficit if you’re not willing to cut Medicare. But to save a congressional seat, they’re falsely attacking a candidate for even saying that “entitlements” should be “on the table.”

So much for the GOP going out there and defending the Ryan budget. This looks like full-scale retreat.

By  |  10:15 AM ET, 05/17/2011

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company