wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost

The Post Most: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Should the United States fund the service program AmeriCorps? President Obama would increase its budget. Rep. Paul Ryan would eliminate federal funding for the program.

Submit
Next
Review your answers and share

Join a Discussion

There are no discussions scheduled today.

Weekly schedule, past shows

Post Partisan
Posted at 05:14 PM ET, 08/31/2011

Obama’s speech — on the next government spending crisis?


President Obama on Wednesday argued that Congress must approve a temporary transportation funding bill in September, or else highway projects won’t get done, construction crews will lose their jobs, and America will fall behind in fixing its roads, tunnels, bridges and other critical infrastructure. Fox News’s headline : “Obama Calls for Extension of Gas Tax to Fund Highway Construction, Repair.” Even though the president didn’t mention the words “gas,” “gasoline” or “tax” once, and even though renewing the federal tax wasn’t a major issue any of the other times Congress recently extended the transportation bill.

Consider this a hint of what we will hear next month and beyond, when which critics will no doubt be tempted to claim that Obama and the Democrats want to “increase” your federal gas taxes merely by extending the current rate, or at the very least that the federal gas tax is another Obamaesque big-government scheme that must go. Conservative Republicans will probably have two chances to hit Obama on this — once in the debate over temporarily extending existing law to give Congress time to agree on a long-term transportation funding bill, and again when lawmakers get to hashing out the long-term policy.

Attacking America’s relatively small federal gas tax might make for great politics. But it encourages really dismal policy, subverting one of the most rational tax provisions Congress has ever managed to pass.

The original, bipartisan logic of the federal gas tax is that those who use the roads should pay for them. Taxing fuel is one way to approximate that elegant goal in the real world. Part of the reason the policy is only an approximation is that Congress didn’t index the tax for inflation, which means it has been decreasing in real dollars since the last time Congress raised it in 1993, even as the Transportation Trust Fund runs out of money. That, of course, argues for an increase.


President Obama talking about transportation funding in the White House Rose Garden on Wednesday. (LARRY DOWNING - REUTERS)
Critics contend that gas-tax money goes to more than just highway building — it also funds public transit networks and other such things. That’s true: Taxing gasoline now accomplishes more than just funding road construction — it gets drivers to pay more of the real costs of their oil habit, and it helps mitigate America’s dependence. America’s oil addiction is very expensive — much more so than what Americans pay at the pump. It enriches distasteful foreign regimes. It pollutes the air Americans breathe. And it contributes to global warming. Putting numbers behind the self-evident, a Harvard study last year found that the only policy that would really cut America’s oil use is making more of those costs explicit in the price of fuel. That, again, means a higher federal gas tax. Americans would conserve where they could, eliminating unnecessary trips and using those public transportation networks more often. Higher demand for efficient cars would make them more abundant and cheaper. The country would keep more money at home.

Obama, of course, won’t make this case, either. Regardless of whether Fox’s angle on the president’s Wednesday speech was misleading, the fact that he didn’t mention the gas tax is telling. Obama and his surrogates have kept miles of distance between them and proposals to raise the gas tax, particularly following an oil spike in May that the administration found politically harrowing. And the politics of tax policy have only gotten worse lately — each side claiming the other wants to raise your taxes, making the debate more about accusations than nuance.

The politics might demand cowardice on the federal gas tax. But it makes for depressing viewing. Instead of going in the right direction, the best we seem to be able to hope for is that Obama and the Democrats can keep us from hitting reverse.

By  |  05:14 PM ET, 08/31/2011

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company