Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Review your answers and share
Post Partisan
Posted at 04:11 PM ET, 05/15/2012

PostScript: Milbank’s ‘first female president’

Dana Milbank’s column, “Barack Obama, the first female president” struck a nerve with readers today. Milbank examined President Obama’s commencement speech at New York’s Barnard College yesterday and found the kind of one-of-us rhetoric that would metaphorically make Obama a woman the way, metaphorically, Toni Morrison made President Bill Clinton black. As Nisha Chittal pointed out on Twitter, Milbank is not the first Post opinion columnist to use the first-female-president construct:

Does the WaPo op-ed page have no new ideas? Dana Milbank, today: Kathleen Parker, June 2010:

Parker, though, was commenting on Obama’s beta-male demeanor, rather than his support for women’s issues. Milbank eventually jumped into the comments on his column to dryly reassure literal-minded readers, “I do not really think Obama is a woman.” Flip-flop?

Among the more than 2,000 comments on Milbank’s piece, readers questioned the validity of his assumptions. Cmhbph1 challenged that there is a gender gap for Obama to exploit:

CNN now has Romney leading Obama 46% to 44% among women. It is within the margin of error but it hardly supports stating that Obama owns the female vote.

Readers also took issue with Milbank’s characterization of Obama’s speech: “Monday’s activities veered into pandering, as Obama brazenly flaunted his feminine mystique.” They countered that the medium is the message. Maybe the pandering that Milbank found is a necessary component of a graduation speech, along with pomp, circumstance and Oh The Places You’ll Go. As Saulpaulus said:

this speech was more along the lines of boosting [the students’] self-image. Isn’t that something ALL commencement speakers are SUPPOSED to do . . .

Maybe, except for truly, truly special graduates who can take the unvarnished truth.

Jhillmurphy points out that politics is all-pander, all the time, but the good ones hide it better:

I guess the trick is to make one’s pandering not seem like pandering, sort of like not making your crush on someone seem like a crush. A project for all of us perhaps — find candidates’ graduation and other speeches which are pandering but don’t seem like [it].

Conversely, BenGrahamsGhost argued that, if Obama is pandering, he’s doing it wrong. You can’t pander effectively, the commenter argues, while simultaneously being old-school sexist:

“ ‘You can be stylish and powerful, too,’ President Obama said.” Stylish? Would Obama have said similar to an all-men’s college? “Men, you can be stylish and powerful too.” Stylish. Gawd.

Perhaps the president noticed that every one of the women graduates had copied his outfit for the ceremony.

By Rachel Manteuffel  |  04:11 PM ET, 05/15/2012

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company