wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost2

Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Will Rep. Paul Ryan's anti-poverty proposal help the poor?

Submit
Next
Review your answers and share

Join a Discussion

Weekly schedule, past shows

Post Partisan
Posted at 01:27 PM ET, 06/09/2011

Rollins slap at Palin shows Bachmann isn’t afraid of a fight



The squabble between Sarah Palin’s peeps and those of Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) is quite entertaining. Not that we didn’t see this coming. Months ago, Bachmann bumped Palin as Tea Party queen. But now that Bachmann is this close to jumping into the race for the Republican nomination for president — and Palin is pretending to think about doing same but we all know she won’t — the gloves are coming off in earnest.

Jennifer Rubin raises some good points about the wisdom of Bachmann hiring Ed Rollins. “She’s fresh; he’s not,” Rubin writes. “She’s anti-Beltway; he personifies it. She’s disciplined; and he’s shown he’s not.” And Rubin points out why Rollins’s slam of Palin as “not serious” might not have been the smartest move.

This was dumb on multiple levels including (in no particular order): 1) it took the focus off his boss; 2) it will offend voters who are Bachmann’s natural constituency; and 3) it plays into the sexist “Palin v. Bachmann!” match-up that his boss has tried to downplay.

  
But here’s why an attack on Palin is a safe and potentially beneficial move on Bachmann’s part.


As the Pollster.com graph shows, Palin’s national political standing has been all downhill since her splashy debut in September 2008. The latest Post-ABC News poll, released this week, only adds to Palin’s negative momentum.

When 64 percent of the country says it won’t vote for you (up 11 percent since November 2009), when 42 percent of your fellow Republicans say they won’t vote for you (up 18 percent since November 2009, which is also the biggest increase), and when you’ve done nothing to alter the perception that you’re “not serious,” why shouldn’t you be attacked?

In the movie “Elizabeth,” Walsingham tells Queen Elizabeth, “A prince should never flinch from being blamed for acts of ruthlessness, which are necessary for safeguarding the state and their own person. You must take these things so much to heart that you do not fear to strike. Even the very nearest that you have if they be implicated.” This is a tad dramatic, I know, but the Rollins slap at Palin (and the backhanded apology) is a sign to me that Bachmann isn’t too afraid of a fight.


By  |  01:27 PM ET, 06/09/2011

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company