Most Read: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Would you use an app that tells you the partisan affiliation of products you're considering buying?

Submit
Next
Review your answers and share

Join a Discussion

There are no discussions scheduled today.

Weekly schedule, past shows

Post Partisan
Posted at 09:08 AM ET, 02/23/2012

Va.’s anti-abortion bill: This is conservatism?


Without quite realizing it, Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell and his fellow anti-abortion zealots have stumbled on a marvelous idea. What they want — what they originally wanted — is for women to undergo an ultrasound procedure before having an abortion. I suggest, in the same spirit, that the governor and like-minded members of the legislature undergo a brain scan before voting on any legislation that affects the health and welfare of women. The results, based on what we’ve been seeing lately, will be shocking.

The Virginia legislation, itself something of an abortion, is being modified after having been withdrawn or whatever. Great confusion attends the deliberations of McDonnell, who discovered in his 57th year that a vaginal probe would be intrusive. Still, what remains is a medical procedure of some sort so that the pregnant woman will discover that she is indeed pregnant. She would be confronted with a printout of the ultrasound image, which, under the original legislation, she would have to purchase.

In all fairness, then, members of the legislature would have to purchase their own brain scan, maybe frame the thing and hang it in their office. Then, possibly, their constituents would understand how avowed conservatives could have the government require a woman to undergo some sort of ultrasound procedure and — mandate of all mandates — have to pay for it herself. If this is conservatism, it is indistinguishable from what conservatives say they hate.

It is at moments such as this that I miss L. Douglas Wilder, Virginia’s former governor. When he ran for office (1989), he ingeniously defined his pro-choice position as conservative. He was, of course, right. The very notion that the government does not have the right to tell a woman what she must do with her body — how she must make a very personal decision — should be the essence of conservatism. Instead, in the name of less government and less-intrusive government at that, we get the government itself telling a woman she must humiliate herself with a tutorial on pregnancy and the creation of life before she makes an extremely personal decision.

As with the Republican presidential debates, it soon becomes apparent that on social issues, conservatives have no cruising speed. They evince meanness. In the case of abortion, it is not enough to oppose it. A woman must be confronted and, if possible, shamed — given the printout, lectured on what it shows, the unspoken rebuke sounded over and over again: See, see, see! This is not so much as pro-life as it is anti-woman. I’m sure that would show up on the brain scan.

By  |  09:08 AM ET, 02/23/2012

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company