wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost

The Post Most: Opinions

direct signup

Today’s Opinions poll

Should the United States fund the service program AmeriCorps? President Obama would increase its budget. Rep. Paul Ryan would eliminate federal funding for the program.

Submit
Next
Review your answers and share
Post Partisan
Posted at 06:41 PM ET, 05/08/2012

What the White House forgot to mention about that student loan rate hike


On Tuesday, Republicans in the Senate blocked a bill that would have kept the interest rate on new, subsidized student loans from doubling to 6.8 percent this July, amid disagreements over how to pay for a $6 billion, one-year extension of the current rate. White House Press Secretary Jay Carney quickly released a statement, but it seems he forgot to include some details. I have your back on this, Jay. Here are a few edits that make this version a little fairer:

It is extremely disappointing [but not really] that Republicans in the Senate today voted to ask millions of students to pay an average of $1,000 each [over the course of a 10-year repayment window] in order to protect a loophole that allows millionaires to dodge payroll taxes [which could be closed to pay for something else more important than extending that student-loan rate]. On July 1, more than 7.4 million students across the country will see their interest rates double unless Congress acts [though the higher rate will only apply to new loans, not existing ones, and most people with student debt never had access the 3.4 percent rate, anyway]. We’re pleased that despite failing to address it in their budget, Republicans in Congress now profess to be concerned about this coming rate hike [but of course they would, since, as this press release demonstrates, we have been trying to bludgeon political opponents with the rate-hike issue]. But now it’s time for them to stop refighting old political battles [which is ironic for us to say, because this whole rate-cut thing started in 2006 as a Democratic campaign gimmick] and prove they’re serious by proposing a real solution to keep rates low for students without burdening middle class families or undercutting preventive health care for women. [Notice how we got the “War on Women” in there?] We look forward to continuing to work with Congress to prevent rates from doubling and ensure that students continue to get a fair shot at an affordable education. [Of course, 6.8 percent would still be beyond fair to students with zero credit history.]

I hope the White House sees this in time. They wouldn’t want people to get the wrong idea about this rate hike.

Update, 11:59 p.m.: The text above has been very slightly edited for clarity.

By  |  06:41 PM ET, 05/08/2012

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company