Jim Lehrer gets savaged on Twitter

 

Post media critic Erik Wemple begs to differ

There’s no argument here that Lehrer kept the polemics confined to the rules that he outlined at the beginning of the clash, whatever they were. Nor is there any argument here that the candidates didn’t ignore his ever-so-polite quasi-interruptions to inform them that their time was up.

Yet the debate was excellent — free-flowing, multitopical, informative and civil. Maybe a little too civil. Credit for those distinctions may well rest with the candidates, who’d obviously been drilling and drilling far more than they’d acknowledged in their expectations-lowering public statements prior to the Denver showdown.

Rachel Weiner covers local politics for The Washington Post.
Comments
Show Comments
Most Read Politics
Next Story
Kevin Merida · October 3, 2012