Jim Lehrer to critics: ‘So what?’

Jim Lehrer responds to those who thought he let President Obama and Mitt Romney ramble on and roll over him in Wednesday’s presidential debate [...]

"It was frustrating as it began happening, when they didn't answer the questions directly and they went over time. But I kept reminding myself: “Hey, wait a minute. Waaait a minute. This isn't about rules. This is about the reality of the exchange of the two candidates.” So I just backed off. . . . I had no problem doing that. Yes, there were times when I pushed them, and sometimes they ran over and ignored me and all that sort of stuff. So what? I mean, it isn’t about my power, my control or whatever. It was about what the candidates were doing, what they were talking about and what impression they were leaving with the voters. That’s what this is about. It’s not about how I felt about things."

Read the whole story here

Rachel Weiner covers local politics for The Washington Post.
Comments
Show Comments
Most Read Politics
Next Story
Natalie Jennings · October 5, 2012