Most Read: Business

DJIA
0.08%
S&P 500
-0.05%
NASDAQ
-0.30%
 Last Update: 02:22 PM 09/21/2014

World Markets from      

 

Other Market Data from      

 

Key Rates from      

 

Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 09:32 AM ET, 08/05/2011

Advertisers say ICANN’s domain program is flawed


ICANN’s proposal could lead to an explosion of specialized domain names (Illustration by JESS3)
There could be trouble on the horizon for a recently approved proposal that would change the landscape of the Internet.

In June, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers gave its nod to a proposal that would allow for the registration of custom top-level domains, such as .love or .camera. ICANN says the initiative could make it easier to navigate the Web because consumers will know to look to brand-centric or industry-specific domain names for trusted sites.

The Association of National Advertisers, however, disagrees with that assertion, outlining its objections to the proposal in a letter sent to the corporation Thursday.

ANA President Robert Liodice said that the program does not follow the rules and regulations of ICANN itself. Liodice said the ANA does not believe the corporation met its requirements for extensive economic study and consultation with stakeholders before approving the program.

ICANN did not respond to a request for comment.

Liodice said that ICANN should abandon the program. Having so many options for domain names, the ANA said, will confuse consumers and force companies to invest in several domain names to protect their brands.

“They are essentially being forced to buy their own brands from ICANN at an initial price of $185,000,” he said

The letter also raises concerns about consumer privacy, as the opportunity for greater piracy also opens the possibility that customers will unknowingly give their information to sites posing as other companies.

The ANA has historically advocated for industry self-regulation on privacy matters.

Liodice said that he hopes to resolve the differences with ICANN but is prepared to stop the proposal by legal means if necessary.

“If possible, we are prepared to work with you to generate far better outcomes, but if such collaboration is possible to avoid far more expensive alternatives, we must know now if ICANN is willing to do so,” Liodice wrote.

.

By  |  09:32 AM ET, 08/05/2011

Tags:  IP, Privacy

 
Read what others are saying
     

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company