Most Read: Business

 Last Update: 5:07 PM 04/27/2015(NASDAQ&DJIA)

World Markets from      


Other Market Data from      


Key Rates from      


Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 01:15 PM ET, 07/29/2011

Analyst says key FCC staff excluded in LightSquared decision; Agency denies claim

1:15 p.m. Update:

The Federal Communications Commission on Friday strongly denied analyst Patrick Comack’s claims that key agency staff members weren’t consulted about a crucial waiver that fast-tracked billionaire Philip Falcone’s satellite venture LightSquared.

“These are patently false allegations from an individual whose interests are clearly compromised,” said Tammy Sun, a spokeswoman for the FCC. “The FCC’s expert staff will continue to run an open, transparent and inclusive process to address interference issues around LightSquared’s proposal, which has the potential to create thousands of jobs and generate billions of dollars of economic investment.”

In a follow-up interview Friday, Comack stood by his allegations, saying he talked to staffers directly who told him they are “very upset” about the waiver.

Comack, who runs an investment research company in Florida, said he doesn’t have personal investments in telecommunications, satellite or GPS companies. He only recommends to other clients which stocks to buy or sell.

Comack said he has a “buy” recommendation on Clearwire, which would compete with LightSquared. In the past, he has said he believes Sprint Nextel will ultimately buy the company, which would reward Clearwire’s investors.

That recommendation, he said, does not mean his interests are compromised. In response to the FCC’s accusations, Comack said: “Why would I lie? I’m putting myself out here.”

We revised our earlier post to be more clear about our attribution and to move up FCC’s denial higher in the piece. Originally we said key staff weren’t consulted in drafting the waiver. The FCC said it was three departments that jointly drafted the waiver. We also clarified the waiver process granted to LightSquared. Here it is:

Staff at the Federal Communications Commission told an equities analyst they weren’t consulted about a crucial waiver that fast-tracked billionaire Philip Falcone’s satellite broadband venture LightSquared, the analyst said.

The FCC denied the claims, saying its international bureau, wireless bureau and engineering department jointly drafted the waiver.

The controversy over LightSquared has attracted more scrutiny to the FCC, which has supported LightSquared’s mobile broadband ambitions even as the GPS industry has warned the network would interfere with key aviation, aerospace and other GPS technologies. Their warnings turned out to be prescient. LightSquared has recently asked GPS technology providers use filtering technology to avoid interference.

Patrick Comack, senior telecom equities analyst at Zachary Investment Research, said in an interview Thursday that staff in the international bureau told him they did not see a waiver that was approved Jan. 26 by bureau chief Mindel de la Torre. The staff would typically work on such a waiver pertaining to satellite spectrum licenses.

“We don’t know how Ms. Mindel De La Torre, chief of the international bureau, had any right to approve the waiver when her staff never reviewed it,” Comack said. “As a matter of fact, Ms. De La Torre’s staff is very upset about the waiver. Isn’t it ironic that the FCC is against their own waiver?”

The FCC granted a waiver in January 2011 to LightSquared that allowed it to build out its network but not activate it until “harmful” interference issues with GPS were resolved. The FCC also granted a waiver in March 2010 that allowed LightSquared to shift from a predominately satellite business to a terrestrial commercial high-speed mobile Internet network that would compete against companies such as AT&T and Verizon Wireless.

GOP lawmakers are looking into the matter and are focusing on a couple core questions: On what basis did the FCC approve LightSquared’s conversion from a satellite to a land-based network? And why did it do so without a full vote of commissioners?


Grassley to FCC: what are you hiding?

Aviation, GPS industry concerned about LightSquared

By  |  01:15 PM ET, 07/29/2011

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company