Most Read: Business

 Last Update: : AM 04/28/2015(NASDAQ&DJIA)

World Markets from      


Other Market Data from      


Key Rates from      


Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 09:10 PM ET, 03/30/2011

Analysts: AT&T, T-Mobile could face long review

In Washington, what's not said can be a powerful message. And when it comes to AT&T’s proposed acquisition of T-Mobile, a dull response by lawmakers and regulators about the deal has signaled to Wall Street and industry insiders that “an air of inevitability has settled,” according to tech policy analysts.

Rebecca Arbogast and David Kaut of Stifel Nicolaus investment house wrote in a research note that instead, a call by lawmakers for a careful and close review of the deal is really more code language for a protracted review.

They don’t rule out that the Justice Department or Federal Communications Commission will block the transaction. But they believe that after a one-year to 18-month review, regulators could approve the deal with a bevy of conditions.

“The deal couldn’t be won in a week, but could have been lost, and it wasn’t,” the analysts wrote.

Yes, an FCC official has said in reports that the companies will face an uphill battle. That’s what they said about Comcast’s joint venture with NBC Universal, too.

Here’s how the merger could affect the entire industry: conditions.

Divesting spectrum is widely expected as a condition. Data roaming, net neutrality, special access reforms are all wonky debates at the FCC that public interest groups want and will most definitely will try to slap onto any merger approval.

The end of exclusive handset deals, bill shock rules and early termination fees are the pocketbook consumer issues that consumer advocacy groups want the FCC to address and will say is imperative for a merged company with 130 million subscribers.

One important question Justice and the FCC will ask: How does the deal eliminate competition? They use a formula for calculating how much concentration a company has in a market with their spectrum holding. More is bad. But the analysis is a guideline, Arbogast and Kaut wrote. They are “merely triggers for additional, closer analysis, and should not be interpreted as setting a ceiling,” they said.

Related story:

NY Attorney General vows to probe AT&T, T-Mobile merger

By  |  09:10 PM ET, 03/30/2011

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company