Most Read: Business

 Last Update: : AM 04/19/2015(NASDAQ&DJIA)

World Markets from      


Other Market Data from      


Key Rates from      


Blog Contributors

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee

Timothy B. Lee covers technology policy, including copyright and patent law, telecom regulation, privacy, and free speech. He also writes about the economics of technology. He has previously written for Ars Technica and Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter or send him email.

Brian Fung

Brian Fung

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on electronic privacy, national security, digital politics and the Internet that binds it all together. He was previously the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic. His writing has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect and Nonprofit Quarterly. Follow Brian on Google+ .

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government. She also delves into the societal impacts of technology access and how innovation is intertwined with cultural development.

Post Tech
About / Where's Post I.T.?   |    Twitter  |   On Facebook  |  RSS RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Cecilia
Posted at 03:38 PM ET, 10/18/2012

Apple, Samsung continue worldwide court battle

The Apple Inc. logo is seen in the lobby of New York City's flagship Apple store in this Jan. 18, 2011 file photo. (Mike Segar - Reuters)
There have been a couple of new developments in the worldwide battle between Apple and Samsung, in the United States and in Britain.

District court judge Lucy Koh, who presided over Apple’s successful patent case against Samsung in August, ordered Apple to publicly disclose its sales, earnings and profit margins on the iPhone on Wednesday.

Koh disagreed with Apple’s argument that disclosing this information would provide its competitors with an unfair advantage.

As CNET reported, the matter is also scheduled to go before the U.S. Court of Appeals, which will come to its own decision on the matter.

In Britain, an appeals court ruled that Apple must post public apologies to Samsung for saying the Korean company copied the iPad’s design with its own tablets.

The Cupertino, Calif. firm will have to publish the apologies in newspapers and on its own Web site unless it decides to appeal the decision to the British Supreme Court. The ruling, Reuters reported, will stand across Europe.

In a statement, a Samsung spokesman said that the company welcomes the decision.

“We continue to believe that Apple was not the first to design a tablet with a rectangular shape and rounded corners and that the origins of Apple’s registered design features can be found in numerous examples of prior art,” the statement said. “Should Apple continue to make excessive legal claims in other countries based on such generic designs, innovation in the industry could be harmed and consumer choice unduly limited.”

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment on either ruling.

By  |  03:38 PM ET, 10/18/2012

Read what others are saying

    © 2011 The Washington Post Company